That’s one big poo poo call

Some examples from IFAB:

A defending player (Team A) challenges an attacking player (Team B) and deliberately kicks the ball (no foul is committed). After that, the ball goes directly to another Team B player who is in an offside position. What is the correct decision?
The referee allows play to continue. There is no offside offence if a player in an offside position receives the ball from an opponent who deliberately plays the ball.

In yesterdays example, Konate is challenging for the ball and plays it.

An attacking player (Team A) in an offside position receives the ball from a defending player (Team B) who made a clear movement towards the ball and tried to intercept a pass that could lead to a clear goal-scoring opportunity. Is the defender’s action considered a ‘deliberate save’ for offside?
No, because a ‘save’ is only when a player stops, or attempts to stop, a ball which is going into or very close to the goal. The referee allows play to continue as the attacking player (Team A) is not considered to have gained an advantage as the defender (Team B) deliberately played the ball.

Again, Konate has made a deliberate and clear movement to the ball.

He moved his foot in an attempt to stop a shot at an open goal. This doesn't count as deliberately playing the ball. The laws explicitly state this.

If Konate doesn't challenge Valverde then he is going to roll the ball into an open net. Therefore it is an attempt to save a goal.

You should really learn to read and then read the laws.

If Konate doesn't challenge Valverde then he is going to roll the ball into an open net. Therefore it is an attempt to save a goal.
====
No he isn't ffs. He has already had his touch, which was not going into the goal. Konates action is not a save.
Read the IFAB explanations and stop mugging yourself off.

Thank fack justice was done in the end.

comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 38 minutes ago
If Konate doesn't challenge Valverde then he is going to roll the ball into an open net. Therefore it is an attempt to save a goal.
====
No he isn't ffs. He has already had his touch, which was not going into the goal. Konates action is not a save.
Read the IFAB explanations and stop mugging yourself off.

Thank fack justice was done in the end.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Right, so your telling me that you think Valverde is such a terrible football that if he gets a loose ball in the box with an open goal and nobody challenges it, he isnt going to try to score with it?

Genuinely concerned for you. Do you have a regular carer to help you with life?

"If he gets" - ??? So you are saying the shot hasn't even been taken when Konate plays the ball??

And thankyou, someone did challenge him. Konate. As IFAB explain, a defender challenging and playing the ball is a deliberate act and means an attacker who is in an offside position and gets the ball from the opponent is not offside.

comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 23 minutes ago
And thankyou, someone did challenge him. Konate. As IFAB explain, a defender challenging and playing the ball is a deliberate act and means an attacker who is in an offside position and gets the ball from the opponent is not offside.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As IFAB explains, attempting to block a shot on goal doesn't count for offsides.

Imagine basing your entire argument around the idea that Valverde is such an inept footballer that he isnt going to try and score in an open goal when he gets a loos ball in the box.

comment by RtM (U1097)
posted 1 day, 16 hours ago
The true score was obviously 2-0 Madrid
----------------------------------------------------------------------
3-0.
dont know y the gol jussed b4 finale wissle was not aloud

You are correct. Not sure how I forgot about that.

The ball went intoo the gol b4 ref blowed 4 end of game