Antony

comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 13 minutes ago
Has stretty been banned, again? What did he do this time?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
3 times on the same article

https://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/457320

comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 13 minutes ago
Has stretty been banned, again? What did he do this time?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
3 times on the same article

https://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/457320
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just read that thread now!

Also, on another topic altogether is seems MU52 is far more popular then Melbourne Red looking at how many comments they've had on their respective Antony articles.

comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 26 minutes ago
Has stretty been banned, again? What did he do this time?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

He started to type words

comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 46 minutes ago
comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 26 minutes ago
Has stretty been banned, again? What did he do this time?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

He started to type words
----------------------------------------------------------------------

comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 2 hours, 27 minutes ago
His ability as a player has no bearing on my views on this. It could be Fernandes, Rashford etc and I'd still not want them at United if they beat up their wives.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wish others on here could be as honest and as consistent as you are, Diafol.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I will also admit I'd be more gutted if it were a more important player for the team but my views on whether they should stay/go would be the same I'd like to think.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absobloodylitely Diafol. Greenwood had twice the talent of Antony, but he had to go.

comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 4 hours ago
comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 2 hours, 27 minutes ago
His ability as a player has no bearing on my views on this. It could be Fernandes, Rashford etc and I'd still not want them at United if they beat up their wives.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wish others on here could be as honest and as consistent as you are, Diafol.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I will also admit I'd be more gutted if it were a more important player for the team but my views on whether they should stay/go would be the same I'd like to think.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absobloodylitely Diafol. Greenwood had twice the talent of Antony, but he had to go.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think it would be easier if it were a player that isn’t as talented or liked, Maguire for example or DVB. But I do think that most of us would have the same opinion (either way) regardless on the talent/importance to the team.

The difference mostly presents itself in the following way:

Strict adherence to innocent until proven guilty. So with Greenwood for example, he wasn’t proven guilty so is therefore innocent in the eyes of the law. Yet we heard what we heard. We don’t know if it was 100% genuine or edited to portray what it sounded like.

But we are human, so for most of us it was appalling & disgusting what we heard and I think that if it was all super-edited and all a ‘hoax’ from the victim then a. United would have likely kept him and b. A statement to this effect would have been made.

So, for me, it is most likely that what we heard (or close enough) did happen. The victim, for whatever reason(s), chose to reconcile with him but United couldn’t continue with him.

As for the Antony cases, I don’t know a lot about them but multiple accusations never looks good. It might be complete BS, it might be accurate. At this point everyone needs to allow the process of law take place and then make judgments / decisions. Until then, it is just presumptions, assumptions and suppositions.

We are a media dream though right now though, good fking lord

Maybe we await till matters are decided in a court of law before we start disciplining and getting rid of people.

This is what happens when you let public opinion drive your decision making.

If he's found innocent (or guilty) at trial that should be the end of it. Before then, he's a united player and should be picked based solely on form (ie he shouldn't not be picked )

comment by Onana_banana_fi_fa_fofana (U20611)
posted 43 seconds ago
Maybe we await till matters are decided in a court of law before we start disciplining and getting rid of people.

This is what happens when you let public opinion drive your decision making.

If he's found innocent (or guilty) at trial that should be the end of it. Before then, he's a united player and should be picked based solely on form (ie he shouldn't not be picked)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
People will disagree with you because they don’t like you but the above is correct

comment by Onana_banana_fi_fa_fofana (U20611)
posted 14 minutes ago
Maybe we await till matters are decided in a court of law before we start disciplining and getting rid of people.

This is what happens when you let public opinion drive your decision making.

If he's found innocent (or guilty) at trial that should be the end of it. Before then, he's a united player and should be picked based solely on form (ie he shouldn't not be picked)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree on Antony , but not Greenwood,, as Sat Nav posted above. L

comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 hours, 21 minutes ago
comment by Onana_banana_fi_fa_fofana (U20611)
posted 43 seconds ago
Maybe we await till matters are decided in a court of law before we start disciplining and getting rid of people.

This is what happens when you let public opinion drive your decision making.

If he's found innocent (or guilty) at trial that should be the end of it. Before then, he's a united player and should be picked based solely on form (ie he shouldn't not be picked)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
People will disagree with you because they don’t like you but the above is correct
----------------------------------------------------------------------

But isn't this essentially what most people are saying?