So United win the Net Spend Trophy

comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 3 hours, 52 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 15 hours, 55 minutes ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 36 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 4 hours, 55 minutes ago
CAS ruled on the inflated Etihad deal that it was not "established to the comfortable satisfaction [of CAS]" which is a bit like saying Greenwood is 100% innocent or that Blatter never took bribes.

They also stated City had a "blatant disregard" for UEFA's Financial Fair Play (FFP) investigation principles".

The innocent usually cooperate to clear their name .
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Man City are complete innocent. Their fans are in this thread denying everything. You have to laugh.q
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Who has denied what exactly?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
See.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No I can’t, that’s why I asked! Who’s denying what?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

TBF, Boris denies everything, so if he has commented on this thread then denial is in da house.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, Boris is total denial. Even the other three city fans on here distance themselves from him.

I think you’ll find the bolloxs talked is from other fans on here.
Boris and other City fans on this site are reasonable and decent bunch.

comment by Carter (U18826)
posted 6 minutes ago
I think you’ll find the bolloxs talked is from other fans on here.
Boris and other City fans on this site are reasonable and decent bunch.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You are a daily mail sensationalist wet dream 4skin

comment by Carter (U18826)
posted 13 minutes ago
I think you’ll find the bolloxs talked is from other fans on here.
Boris and other City fans on this site are reasonable and decent bunch.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve nothing against Boris, but he’s definitely not reasonable when it comes to his blind defence of City….

comment by Carter (U18826)
posted 2 minutes ago
You are a daily mail sensationalist wet dream 4skin
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thx man

That means the world 2 me

Whutever daily mail means

comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 25 minutes ago
comment by Carter (U18826)
posted 13 minutes ago
I think you’ll find the bolloxs talked is from other fans on here.
Boris and other City fans on this site are reasonable and decent bunch.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve nothing against Boris, but he’s definitely not reasonable when it comes to his blind defence of City….
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why am I unreasonable?

You keep making the same accusations about the club, people correct and supply links to prove you were wrong but you still persist.

The is the same amount of information in the public domain now as there was 6 months ago, the hearing hasn’t even started so why should I or any other fan of the club change their opinion or their stance?

100

4Skin’s a bell wipe and should be ignored

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 25 minutes ago
comment by Carter (U18826)
posted 13 minutes ago
I think you’ll find the bolloxs talked is from other fans on here.
Boris and other City fans on this site are reasonable and decent bunch.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve nothing against Boris, but he’s definitely not reasonable when it comes to his blind defence of City….
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why am I unreasonable?

You keep making the same accusations about the club, people correct and supply links to prove you were wrong but you still persist.

The is the same amount of information in the public domain now as there was 6 months ago, the hearing hasn’t even started so why should I or any other fan of the club change their opinion or their stance?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This, a reasoned response that others fans won’t like and collectively will call it nonsense.

Man Utd are actually an example of how to waste money. We had a better goalkeeper in Romero we let go compared to Onana and De Gea. We got rid of Lukaku and since then haven’t bought a striker as good. Everyone knew Man Utd problem last season was finishing so what do we do, keep the main strikers the same and bring in a kid who ain’t known for finishing.😂 We let Greenwood go on loan who was declared innocent just for PR reasons when he is the player we need.

Chelsea are like Man Utd recently in transfers buy players for way more than they are worth who don’t improve anything. If I was in charge I would have made sure we got Harry Kane and kept Greenwood at the club and got Romero back. People say but for commercial reasons we had to loan out Greenwood but the fact is if he is innocent why should he leave?

LVG was right, Man Utd are just a commercial club now. They don’t care about on pitch success. We were like 2 good players away from winning the big trophies as in a good goalkeeper and good striker but now seem miles away.