Man Utd, Liverpool, Arsenal

No really,

They don't call them ccknys for nothing

comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Admiral Ozil is my new favourite Star Wars character (U10178)
posted 4 hours, 52 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - There used to be a football club over there (U18109)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 34 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - There used to be a football club over there (U18109)
posted 11 minutes ago
Klopp - when will the FA clamp down on this moaning khunting cheat

Arsenal cheated back in 1919 by bribing their way into the league in the first place - apparently the FA’s new thing is looking back on things it’s known for over a decade.

United - you have ETH, you’ve been punished enough
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1919
----------------------------------------------------------------------
tbf this really formed all of arsenals success from that point on. Would it have been fine if roman bought chelsea in 1919 then? Whens the cut off?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Well exactly, my post was tongue in cheek as it’s over a 100 years old, but the point is where is the FA’s cut off point with this stuff. Why is it farcical to try and punish Arsenal for an incredibly serious breach of the rules 100 years ago, but perfectly legitimate to potentially punish Spurs for a far less serious breach 15 years ago?

The problem is the FA is utterly useless to a man.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I'd say given that nobody involved is now alive would be a good yardstick for where it should stop. There should be a statue of limitations for this sort of thing whether that is 10 years or longer is up for debate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A statue of limitations


----------------------------------------------------------------------

The Statute of Liberty.

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Admiral Ozil is my new favourite Star Wars character (U10178)
posted 4 hours, 52 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - There used to be a football club over there (U18109)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 34 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - There used to be a football club over there (U18109)
posted 11 minutes ago
Klopp - when will the FA clamp down on this moaning khunting cheat

Arsenal cheated back in 1919 by bribing their way into the league in the first place - apparently the FA’s new thing is looking back on things it’s known for over a decade.

United - you have ETH, you’ve been punished enough
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1919
----------------------------------------------------------------------
tbf this really formed all of arsenals success from that point on. Would it have been fine if roman bought chelsea in 1919 then? Whens the cut off?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Well exactly, my post was tongue in cheek as it’s over a 100 years old, but the point is where is the FA’s cut off point with this stuff. Why is it farcical to try and punish Arsenal for an incredibly serious breach of the rules 100 years ago, but perfectly legitimate to potentially punish Spurs for a far less serious breach 15 years ago?

The problem is the FA is utterly useless to a man.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I'd say given that nobody involved is now alive would be a good yardstick for where it should stop. There should be a statue of limitations for this sort of thing whether that is 10 years or longer is up for debate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A statue of limitations


----------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You know what he meant, I’m sure it was just a typo

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 7 minutes ago
The Statute of Liberty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
BLM tearing down the statutes.

So Admiral Ozil makes one typo about Statues of limitation and it’s a thicko like Member can talk about - great

comment by Striketeam7 - There used to be a football club over there (U18109)
posted 2 minutes ago
So Admiral Ozil makes one typo about Statues of limitation and it’s a thicko like Member can talk about - great
----------------------------------------------------------------------
*all

Admiral if it makes you feel any better, “thicky” Gibson and Member have mistakenly attributed your comment to me - conclusive proof of how faaacking dumb they are