I saw this said on the BBC regarding Klopp and Guardiola. That there has supposedly been this great back and forth rivalry between Pep and Klopp. But if you look at the facts, it's just not true. In the time both have been in England, Pep has won:
1 Treble
1 CL
5 PL titles
2 FA Cups
4 League Cups
Compared to for Klopp:
0 Trebles
1 CL (won against furrrking Pockets' Tottenham)
1 PL title
1 FA Cup
2 League Cups
If this is a rivalry, it's the most one-sided rivalry I've ever seen. Pep has completely dominated Klopp and England in general since he arrived. There's no rivalry here. Its so frustrating how the Liverpool biased media try to paint out as if Klopp has even remotely stood up to Pep.
Pep has destroyed him. It's not even close between the two of them.
The so-called 'Era-defining rivalry'
posted on 10/3/24
Klopp's entire time at Liverpool doesn't matter. We should only talk about that golden 4 year period in which Pep still won 3 league titles to Klopp's 1.
posted on 10/3/24
comment by Jaygarcia Saturn (U23145)
posted 9 minutes ago
Klopp's entire time at Liverpool doesn't matter. We should only talk about that golden 4 year period in which Pep still won 3 league titles to Klopp's 1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fvck off back down your hole Wahl you lame cvnt.
posted on 10/3/24
Pep has spent over half a billion more than Klopp.
The fact that Klopp won one title is a miracle. He had absolutely no right to given their clout.
A good analogy would be handing one man £500m and the other man £1bn and asking them both to build the best mansion possible.
There should only ever be one outcome.
As for the titles, the two that City won by a mere hairs breath wasn’t so much down to quality but just luck. If a referee blows for Rodri’s handball then Liverpool win the title. That’s got nothing to do with Pep outperforming Klopp.
It could’ve very easily been 3 PL titles each. Literally with the blow of a referees whistle could’ve swung it.
posted on 10/3/24
Scousers clutching at straws.
posted on 10/3/24
comment by This Charming Fan (Why pamper life's complexities...?) (U11214)
posted 1 minute ago
Scousers clutching at straws.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope.
posted on 10/3/24
comment by Metro.⚽️ (U6770)
posted 2 hours, 17 minutes ago
Pep has spent over half a billion more than Klopp.
The fact that Klopp won one title is a miracle. He had absolutely no right to given their clout.
A good analogy would be handing one man £500m and the other man £1bn and asking them both to build the best mansion possible.
There should only ever be one outcome.
As for the titles, the two that City won by a mere hairs breath wasn’t so much down to quality but just luck. If a referee blows for Rodri’s handball then Liverpool win the title. That’s got nothing to do with Pep outperforming Klopp.
It could’ve very easily been 3 PL titles each. Literally with the blow of a referees whistle could’ve swung it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Firstly, are you saying Liverpool FC are run by a local charity?
Rodri:
IF an Everton pl;ayer hadn't been offside.
IF the referee or var had given a penalty
IF Everton had scored.
The final score would have been 1-2 to City.
Talk about clutching straws.
posted on 10/3/24
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Metro.⚽️ (U6770)
posted 2 hours, 17 minutes ago
Pep has spent over half a billion more than Klopp.
The fact that Klopp won one title is a miracle. He had absolutely no right to given their clout.
A good analogy would be handing one man £500m and the other man £1bn and asking them both to build the best mansion possible.
There should only ever be one outcome.
As for the titles, the two that City won by a mere hairs breath wasn’t so much down to quality but just luck. If a referee blows for Rodri’s handball then Liverpool win the title. That’s got nothing to do with Pep outperforming Klopp.
It could’ve very easily been 3 PL titles each. Literally with the blow of a referees whistle could’ve swung it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Firstly, are you saying Liverpool FC are run by a local charity?
Rodri:
IF an Everton pl;ayer hadn't been offside.
IF the referee or var had given a penalty
IF Everton had scored.
The final score would have been 1-2 to City.
Talk about clutching straws.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where does the second City goal come from?
posted on 10/3/24
Shouldn’t Klopp’s rivalry be with LVG, Mourinho, Ole and ETH seeing as they’ve all finished above Klopp as many times as Klopp has finished above Pep?
posted on 10/3/24
comment by Peter O'Hanraha-hanrahan (U1217)
posted 2 hours, 44 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Metro.⚽️ (U6770)
posted 2 hours, 17 minutes ago
Pep has spent over half a billion more than Klopp.
The fact that Klopp won one title is a miracle. He had absolutely no right to given their clout.
A good analogy would be handing one man £500m and the other man £1bn and asking them both to build the best mansion possible.
There should only ever be one outcome.
As for the titles, the two that City won by a mere hairs breath wasn’t so much down to quality but just luck. If a referee blows for Rodri’s handball then Liverpool win the title. That’s got nothing to do with Pep outperforming Klopp.
It could’ve very easily been 3 PL titles each. Literally with the blow of a referees whistle could’ve swung it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Firstly, are you saying Liverpool FC are run by a local charity?
Rodri:
IF an Everton pl;ayer hadn't been offside.
IF the referee or var had given a penalty
IF Everton had scored.
The final score would have been 1-2 to City.
Talk about clutching straws.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where does the second City goal come from?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No answer to this I see.
posted on 11/3/24
comment by Metro.⚽️ (U6770)
posted 1 day, 2 hours ago
Pep has spent over half a billion more than Klopp.
The fact that Klopp won one title is a miracle. He had absolutely no right to given their clout.
A good analogy would be handing one man £500m and the other man £1bn and asking them both to build the best mansion possible.
There should only ever be one outcome.
As for the titles, the two that City won by a mere hairs breath wasn’t so much down to quality but just luck. If a referee blows for Rodri’s handball then Liverpool win the title. That’s got nothing to do with Pep outperforming Klopp.
It could’ve very easily been 3 PL titles each. Literally with the blow of a referees whistle could’ve swung it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As if you still talk about the Rodi handball 🤣