People on here are saying that the fans only booed Wenger's decision to take Chamberlain off and not Arshavin's introduction.
I thought this was the case but just nowI saw the replay on TV of the whole event taking place- Barclays PL review on Skysports1.
Basically, the fans starting booing as Chamberlain started to walk off.
Then they cheered as the stadium announced said 'Leaving the pitch, Oxlade Chamberlain'
But when the announcer said '...replaced by Andrei Arshavin', the booing began again.
You can watch the thing again if you don't believe me.
Just a shame that our fans boo our own players. I don't think this happens in any other PL stadium, and there are teams in a much worse position than us.
Arshavin DID get booed.
posted on 24/1/12
Asharvin's run of bad games did not start on Sunday. He'd always come on and not done particularly well but had not been booed.
The fans booed because of Wenger's poor decision and Asharvin was just a scapegoat in the whole matter.
posted on 24/1/12
Comment Deleted by Article Creator
posted on 24/1/12
Arshavin is a disgrace and should be sold asap, the fans pay good money and are entitled to boo if they see a player who is not trying. The way he just let Valencia run past him was sickening. A once great player is now a lazy waste of space.
posted on 24/1/12
But the booing was not premeditated, it was rather spontaneous and was brought about by Wenger's weird decision to substitute Alex.
Asharvin who was already treading a thin line as far as the fans were concerned was unfortunately in the direct line of fire. But the booing was not premeditated in any way.
posted on 24/1/12
He was probably pretty psyched up until 50000 people booed him
------------------------------
I am not sure that makes a difference. Booing is always a result of pent up frustration. The incompetence of increasing ticket prices to the highest in the league and at the same time selling your best players was astounding. The 8-2, 4-3 and then 3-2 only justified the negativity.
Thats why poorly performing players get it in the neck. Which is not going to help them perform any better. The only solution to this is actually buying a couple of impact players and freshening things up. It worked a little after the 8-2. Without that there is very little chance that Arsene can stem the momentum downward.
Thats why I fear for Wilshere. How can you possibly expect a 18 year old to turn around the season. Sell the players you expect will leave in 6 months (even at a lesser price) and bring in players to change the mood in the dressing room. Show some ambition.
posted on 24/1/12
There are so many bargains available in the transfer market right now so let's not use money as an excuse for Wenger's recent failures. He could have also bought much better players with the money he has spent but he's just too deluded and still thinks that this current crop of players can get us 4th spot.
posted on 24/1/12
Made this suggestion earlier, some disagreed.
http://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/79082
posted on 24/1/12
Made this suggestion earlier, some disagreed.
-----------------------------------------------------------
The problem is that those players are not wanted. Arsene tried to sell Traore last season. Benfica laughed at his £25k a week wages we were giving him. It took an absolute nutter in Warnock to get him of our books.
Unlike normal life, when you terminate a contract you have to pay out its entirety. Just like for CEOs. So its actually cheaper for the club to send the players on loan. That way we only have to pay a percentage of their wages. So its still cheaper.
For example if Bendtner or Denilson do not improve, I can see them on loan for the rest of their contracts.
posted on 24/1/12
Players used to want to play and even take pay cuts in order to do that on a consistent basis. The Arsenal deadwoods prefer to stay and warm the bench because the club has this weird payment policy.
posted on 24/1/12
The Arsenal deadwoods prefer to stay and warm the bench because the club has this weird payment policy.
--------------------------------------------------------------
The plan was to take the best youngsters in the world and develop them to sell for a profit. Its never worked in history. Moneyball in football. Ajax managed for a few years before they built a stadium and nearly went bust.
I think they bet that all the players would make it and the wages would be so obscene in football that the salaries being paid to the youngsters would be still dwarfed by average salaries. So it would be no problem moving players on.
An economic theory dreamt up by someone qualified at Strasbourg than London Business School. Salaries never got obscene except for a very few clubs and developing players based on statistics doesn't take into account behavioural economics.
But the club still fails to acknowledge that the only economic system that works in football is over hyped players. Beckham made the modern Man Utd and his impact started the Galactico model at Madrid. Even Barca spend £30m+ on a couple of players a season. Big name players does so much for the dressing room even if their shirt sales end up being a false economy after a few years.