Surely he was still paid.
In answer to your question: No.
Maybe, I've made an assumption there.
I think Chelsea FC should sue you for defamation of character by making assumptions of their motives
What about loss of earnings for the games he was suspended?
------------------------------------------------------
What about compensation for loss of points because of his poor decisions in that game!
One thing for sure ... It'll be a long time before Clattenburg is allowed to ref a Chelsea match again.
Although that would probably mean more of Martin Atkinson for them
"What about compensation for loss of points because of his poor decisions in that game!"
What poor decisions?
One thing for sure ... It'll be a long time before Clattenburg is allowed to ref a Chelsea match again.
Although that would probably mean more of Martin Atkinson for them
What like a certain Chris Foy incident?
The FA have said the allegations made by Ramires were "made in good faith. It is entirely possible for a witness to be genuinely mistaken and convincing in his belief."
So no he wouldn't have a case.
What poor decisions?
------------------------------------------------
We have a WUM amongst our midst!!
"We have a WUM amongst our midst!!"
Just answer the question.
He can have nothing to complain as Chelsea didnt take the complaint beyond the FA which they are perfectly entitled to do so. He should sue the Society of Black Lawyers though that is certainly defamation.
Sue.....lawyers??
That doesn't sound like such a good idea.
"He should sue the Society of Black Lawyers though that is certainly defamation."
Was just watching that on sky news.
'Society of Black Lawyers' - Is that not, by definition, a fascist/racist organisation?
comment by We_Are_All_Utd (U2259)
posted 3 minutes ago
"We have a WUM amongst our midst!!"
Just answer the question.
----------------------------------------------------
If I want to speak to an idiot I'll address you - until then - fax off!
Brummie Blue - Clattenburg had a decent game so no compensation for 'loss of points' therew I'm afraid. How about suing Chelsea players for loss of points?
Were you attempting to climb the north face of the Eiger when the game was on then Sheep dip!
OP.......Why did you not read the FA statement first and saved yourself writing this article?
Ramires heard clattenberg say those words. Clattenberg denied saying them. The fa as usual call ramires a liar just like they did to jt and ashley cole. The witchunt against chelsea continues
'Society of Black Lawyers' - Is that not, by definition, a fascist/racist organisation?
______________
Fair point imo. There is no such thing as black or white law. The law is the law.
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Defamation of character
Page 1 of 1
posted on 22/11/12
Surely he was still paid.
posted on 22/11/12
In answer to your question: No.
posted on 22/11/12
Maybe, I've made an assumption there.
posted on 22/11/12
I think Chelsea FC should sue you for defamation of character by making assumptions of their motives
posted on 22/11/12
What about loss of earnings for the games he was suspended?
------------------------------------------------------
What about compensation for loss of points because of his poor decisions in that game!
posted on 22/11/12
One thing for sure ... It'll be a long time before Clattenburg is allowed to ref a Chelsea match again.
Although that would probably mean more of Martin Atkinson for them
posted on 22/11/12
"What about compensation for loss of points because of his poor decisions in that game!"
What poor decisions?
posted on 22/11/12
One thing for sure ... It'll be a long time before Clattenburg is allowed to ref a Chelsea match again.
Although that would probably mean more of Martin Atkinson for them
What like a certain Chris Foy incident?
posted on 22/11/12
The FA have said the allegations made by Ramires were "made in good faith. It is entirely possible for a witness to be genuinely mistaken and convincing in his belief."
So no he wouldn't have a case.
posted on 22/11/12
What poor decisions?
------------------------------------------------
We have a WUM amongst our midst!!
posted on 22/11/12
"We have a WUM amongst our midst!!"
Just answer the question.
posted on 22/11/12
He can have nothing to complain as Chelsea didnt take the complaint beyond the FA which they are perfectly entitled to do so. He should sue the Society of Black Lawyers though that is certainly defamation.
posted on 22/11/12
Sue.....lawyers??
That doesn't sound like such a good idea.
posted on 22/11/12
"He should sue the Society of Black Lawyers though that is certainly defamation."
Was just watching that on sky news.
'Society of Black Lawyers' - Is that not, by definition, a fascist/racist organisation?
posted on 22/11/12
comment by We_Are_All_Utd (U2259)
posted 3 minutes ago
"We have a WUM amongst our midst!!"
Just answer the question.
----------------------------------------------------
If I want to speak to an idiot I'll address you - until then - fax off!
posted on 22/11/12
MORON
posted on 22/11/12
Brummie Blue - Clattenburg had a decent game so no compensation for 'loss of points' therew I'm afraid. How about suing Chelsea players for loss of points?
posted on 22/11/12
Were you attempting to climb the north face of the Eiger when the game was on then Sheep dip!
posted on 22/11/12
OP.......Why did you not read the FA statement first and saved yourself writing this article?
posted on 23/11/12
Ramires heard clattenberg say those words. Clattenberg denied saying them. The fa as usual call ramires a liar just like they did to jt and ashley cole. The witchunt against chelsea continues
posted on 23/11/12
'Society of Black Lawyers' - Is that not, by definition, a fascist/racist organisation?
______________
Fair point imo. There is no such thing as black or white law. The law is the law.
Page 1 of 1