Man City vs Chelsea
Fan vs Fan here at the council house, who'd have thought that City would be rivalling Chelsea for a shot at top-four. Maybe Fan is the goat taking the side that Rof rebuilt, to the next level?
Home adv to City, form is identical, as are both sides formations
Chelsea have the bigger names and reputations and I think Wirtz is a good option at #10, Rice and Bellingham are a good mix in the engine. and that back line is up there with the very best in the business.
City have a solid side, Emi is a good keeper, the two CB's are decent but I'm not sold on the FB's and I think they'll get the run around by Chelsea's wingers...I do prefer City's midfield though and they'll get a foothold on the game. No clue who the dog on the wing is for City checked his stats seems decent.
both tactics are well written with no major flaws
City 1-2 Chelsea
Schick (terrier)
Haaland x2 (Torres, Wirtz)
MOTM - Tap in Terry
Wk16
Page 1 of 1
posted on 20/4/22
Man City vs Chelsea
Fan vs Fan here at the council house, who'd have thought that City would be rivalling Chelsea for a shot at top-four. Maybe Fan is the goat taking the side that Rof rebuilt, to the next level?
Home adv to City, form is identical, as are both sides formations
Chelsea have the bigger names and reputations and I think Wirtz is a good option at #10, Rice and Bellingham are a good mix in the engine. and that back line is up there with the very best in the business.
City have a solid side, Emi is a good keeper, the two CB's are decent but I'm not sold on the FB's and I think they'll get the run around by Chelsea's wingers...I do prefer City's midfield though and they'll get a foothold on the game. No clue who the dog on the wing is for City checked his stats seems decent.
both tactics are well written with no major flaws
City 1-2 Chelsea
Schick (terrier)
Haaland x2 (Torres, Wirtz)
MOTM - Tap in Terry
Page 1 of 1