She seems like a vindictive spiteful biiitch for saying that. We all know the repercussions of bringing up gender oppression in 2024 and she did it anyway just because she lost a game of football.

She wanted the single ball rule, then got annoyed with him for making her stick to it toward the end of the game.

Female privileged, she always tries to use the oppression card to cover her team deficiencies when she loses.

Well she wasn’t referring to this, she was referring to his behaviour on the sidelines, which he was also booked for.

But this was poor behaviour on her part, and hypocritical to say the least.

She'll no doubt wake up this morning regretting her actions and words.
A decent game though.

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
Well she wasn’t referring to this, she was referring to his behaviour on the sidelines, which he was also booked for.

But this was poor behaviour on her part, and hypocritical to say the least.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That was what he was explaining about in the video, one /multiple balls. Sure he should've been a gentleman and spoke nicely to the female player in the ideal world, but she should not act like that, annoying woman

If the Arsenal manager said anything like this bringing gender into it, he would be likely be hounded out of his job, “female emotions- etc”

comment by Passion Power - Make 1984 fiction again (U8398)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
Well she wasn’t referring to this, she was referring to his behaviour on the sidelines, which he was also booked for.

But this was poor behaviour on her part, and hypocritical to say the least.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That was what he was explaining about in the video, one /multiple balls. Sure he should've been a gentleman and spoke nicely to the female player in the ideal world, but she should not act like that, annoying woman
----------------------------------------------------------------------

My point was only that the content of the video in the article is not what she was referring to when she referenced aggression.

Eidevall provides the context in the same video.

Hypocritical cow. Didnt she push him at the end of the game?

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 28 minutes ago
Well she wasn’t referring to this, she was referring to his behaviour on the sidelines, which he was also booked for.

But this was poor behaviour on her part, and hypocritical to say the least.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Never liked a strong cockney/Essex accent on a woman and that coupled with the fact that she never shuts up is no good for me.

When she's used as a pundit on tv it's like finger nails being dragged down a blackboard, makes my teeth hurt.

comment by Son Of Gunnersaurus a.k.a SoG (U1310)
posted 57 minutes ago
Hypocritical cow. Didnt she push him at the end of the game?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. Her behaviour is embarrassing. You lost a game and at the end of the game you congratulate your oponnent.

Her female aggression when she pushed him away was there for everyone to see. Basically she's a sore loser.

Waynetta is a bad loser.

Tough to take charge of a pro football team when your ego is that big

Master stroke in media manipulation from Hayes.

Lose a cup final, in which a player collapses and you have a controversial aggressive moment. Talk about male aggression in the women's game. That way, none of the talk is about the loss, the fact Chelsea went against the agreed single ball system when they were losing or that you lost your head and acted aggressively.

Instead, it is about the man and whether he has a place in the women's game.

Exactly. She's the Mourinho of women's football.

Had that been the other way round, it would be round the clock coverage on Sky sports with BBC and ex female footballers saying he should be sacked, with him never getting a job in football again. Gotta love equality

comment by Shaun M - supercalifragilisticOrtaisatrocious (U9955)
posted 22 seconds ago
Had that been the other way round, it would be round the clock coverage on Sky sports with BBC and ex female footballers saying he should be sacked, with him never getting a job in football again. Gotta love equality
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On the other hand, men like Mourinho have gotten away with it all their careers.

So why is this different and/or more serious to some people?

comment by Thorgen Kloppinson (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Shaun M - supercalifragilisticOrtaisatrocious (U9955)
posted 22 seconds ago
Had that been the other way round, it would be round the clock coverage on Sky sports with BBC and ex female footballers saying he should be sacked, with him never getting a job in football again. Gotta love equality
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On the other hand, men like Mourinho have gotten away with it all their careers.

So why is this different and/or more serious to some people?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not more serious,it's what happens in football, the fact is that she's complaining about something Jonas did and then reacts like that, it's very hypocritical.

Also do you really think if the roles were reverse if Jonas pushed Emma like that, that the media wouldn't say anything about it?

Mourinho got scrutinised for weeks regarding that female physio and rightly so. Conti and Tuchel got 2 days blanket coverage for refusing to shake hands post game, yet a woman manager shoves a bloke post match, calls him aggressive and its radio silence. Double standards unsurprisingly.

Lol, this was worth an article? Manager post match tantrum rocks football.

Thanks for posting such insight on the Chelsea board. I feel so much better informed now.

comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 33 minutes ago
Master stroke in media manipulation from Hayes.

Lose a cup final, in which a player collapses and you have a controversial aggressive moment. Talk about male aggression in the women's game. That way, none of the talk is about the loss, the fact Chelsea went against the agreed single ball system when they were losing or that you lost your head and acted aggressively.

Instead, it is about the man and whether he has a place in the women's game.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly this. She knew what she was doing

I thought this was needlessly divisive comment from her, and if Eidevall had pushed her the way she pushed him at the end, he'd probably be facing the sack