So the other....

Clubs want to change the voting within the SPL.

What does everyone else think, would it be fairer? Or is this just a way for the other clubs to overrule the Old Firm.

Personally i can understand the want for it but it is it really fair? Do they attract as much Money to the cause. Is it not the case that Celtic and Rangers create more revenue and therefore deserve
To have more of a say.?

Personally I think that its ok for everyone one to have a say but the votes inre-distribution of funds shouldBe comparative to revenues generated.

Why should the other clubs get more funs if their stadia sit half empty every home game?

I think its easy for all the other clubs to blame all their woes on the old firm but at the end of the day if you
Are shifting merchandise and filling out stadia then you ARE going to struggle for cash.
Im of the opinion that SKY would offer anywhere NEAR the amount if Celtic and Rangers were to refuse, say
Screening Old Firm Matches, which they are perfectly within their rights to do so, then you take that reduced
Revenue and split it between the clubs, will they still be better off?

It seems to me that the Old Firm are the scapegoat here and that these other clubs wont be happy until they are
Getting their coffers filled without selling shirts and seats.

Opinions please.