Its really embarrassing for the bears that it has had to come to this.
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/football/spl/2012/04/04/sfa-divert-35k-of-rangers-tv-revenue-to-dundee-united-following-scottish-cup-clash-86908-23812984/
SFA do something right
posted on 4/4/12
I think the SFA are out of order-Rangers should be banned from the cup,all the SFA are doing is ensuring Rangers are not banned.Ibrox ,Hampden, same people different blazers.
posted on 4/4/12
cos ye blew an easy treble this year?
posted on 4/4/12
DC what has that got to do with Rangers not paying their debts?
posted on 4/4/12
what has a dispute between us and united got to do with celtic?
fückall so pipe doon
posted on 4/4/12
Every scottish cup playing team is involved,phuddball
posted on 4/4/12
DC is getting to the stage nooo.he's puffing 80 a day
posted on 4/4/12
bridge,ye want us papped to give ye an easier run at a cup next year,don't gie us the handwringing,moralistic scheidt
if we get papped,it'll be on the say so of the beaks,not on the opinions of a few tims with agendas
hopefully
cha,thinkin' aboot just installin a drip,naw enough time in the day for rollin'
posted on 4/4/12
DC....Whytes in this fur the long haul...he has the final say in all matters...
posted on 4/4/12
DC, celtic bridge is right. Although i'm glad to see the money getting paid (well some) it should be up to rangers to get their finger out, its them who owe the money not the sfa nor the rangers fans. All the sfa have done is bought rangers more time, they should be out next years scottish like they were supposed to be, the sfa have bent/broken so many rules now for rangers i'm embaressed for them.
posted on 4/4/12
nae bother arab.
As I said it's fookall to do with Celtic whether you get paid or not. Thats between us,you and the SFA.
Since this a precedent in Scottish football to an extent,the SFA are playing it by ear. Interjections by Celtc fans mean nante mate