This is for the bears only...
Do you think a CVA can be agreed and that exiting administration is a possibility
Vote 1 star for agreeing a CVA
Vote 5 stars if you think the only outcome is liquidation
even better, to ensure no WUM's post your comment too...
would be interesting to get a handle on how many think agreeing a CVA is a possibility
simple question
posted on 12/4/12
HMRC hold the answer to that one if the level of debt is whats been quoted and we lose the tax case.
While i think HMRC would prefer get something back rather than nothing if the club liquidates it seems common knowledge that they are using Rangers to set a precedent to go after EPL clubs with a far higher debt.
I would prefer the CVA option but don't think we can really make a fair guess on what will actually happen until the outcome of the tax case is heard.
posted on 12/4/12
Comment Deleted by Article Creator
posted on 12/4/12
I think it will be a NewCo either way, even if we do get the CVA.
I think a CVA may be granted, but only if Craig Whyte is out of the picture.
If not then an the club will just be sold out of admin to a NewCo.
Not sure what one, but either way we will have been saved from liquidation.
posted on 12/4/12
liquidation is looking the most likely,even winning the big tax case they're still boogered with appeals etc.
posted on 12/4/12
Liquidation is looking the least likely.
1. Asset Sale
2. CVA and NewCo
3. CVA and OldCo
4. 'Liquidation'
posted on 12/4/12
Sorry, should read:
1. Asset Sale and NewCo
posted on 12/4/12
I think we've had it
posted on 12/4/12
Haha,
Seriously Irvine?
We will be fine!
posted on 12/4/12
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 12/4/12
Ginge