who bottled it more
David Haye or Neil Lennons Celtic team?
Serious question though why do British sportsmen and women seem to have an inferiority complex when facing decent opposition
Andy Murray
Man U this yr
Celtic
David Haye
anymore?
ok so thoughts
posted on 4/7/11
rangers bottled it against utd - there is no argument of that. They were at home, with the chance of progressing into the last 16 of the CL. All they had to do was put some pressure on Utd and push forward.
Did it happen? Did it nothing.
Celtic were good enough to win the league, but thanks to silly mistakes it wasn't to be.
Now, please explain where I am blaming anyone else for Celtic not winning the league.
posted on 4/7/11
ah we didn't bottle it against united we were just not good enough, now if celtic could just admit that then we would all be better off. Can you admit you were not good enough to win the league, or will you follow your clubs example and blame anyone and everyone . Its all a big conspiracy
we werent good enough, the table doesnt lie...
however, your own manager came out over the weekend and admitted you were very lucky....
somewhere in the middle lies the truth, come down from the high ground now fella
posted on 4/7/11
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 4/7/11
Tyson could have sent his pigeons in to beat any of those two
posted on 4/7/11
Looking at individual case:
Andy Murray, Man United and David Haye were completely out of their depth and never stood a chance. They didn't bottle it, they just weren't good enough.
Celtic on the other hand are grade A cowards and bottlers. When it comes to the crunch, celtics capitulation on the pitch can be expected. Similar to Arsenal, both teams are in the running for the title but you could almost set your watch for the impending collapse. That's the difference between the Rangers and Man U's compared to arsenals and celtics - in their respective competitions, you know who has the bottle to bring home the bacon.
posted on 4/7/11
Establishment
posted on 4/7/11
Establishment, spot on Sir.
posted on 4/7/11
I wish the berz would make their mind up.
When you bear in mind that Celtic were managed by a rookie manager, who ensured his team were knocked out of Europe twice, who never won a game that mattered (according to some Rangers fans.)
All those faults and he just lost the league by a point to the (again according to Rangers fans) the bestest ever football club in the world ever, ever, ever - keysed!!
So is it that Rangers won the league because they deserved it, because Lennon was rubbish or because Celtic's bottle went?
It can't be all of them.
posted on 4/7/11
would love to have seen tyson in his prime fight the 2 of them.
wouldnt have lasted 13 rounds
--------------------
Wouldn't have lasted 13 seconds, mate.
posted on 4/7/11
Rangers have more in common with Arsenal than Celtic do
Celtic have more in common with Man U than Rangers do
Monty, Murray, Rangers- No MAJORS