Miss-placed arrogance

Bet they didn't see anything to worry them at the bridge this season either!

What was the score again?

Mis-placed

Sorry, just noticed

Well let's hope we get a better referee for the final. Nearly every goal Chelsea scored came from the result of a refereeing mistake.

Atkinson has been rewarded for his errors by Eufa, and is the 5th official in the Bayern game.

i know he is only the 5th official, what does that mean by the way?

he still should not have been an option, stupid decision!

He stands at the end of the field and has no imput in the game at all!

comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721) posted 14 minutes ago

Well let's hope we get a better referee for the final. Nearly every goal Chelsea scored came from the result of a refereeing mistake.
------------------------------------------------------
Really? talk us through it then!

Sorry TOOR but that statement is absolute balls mate. Nearly every goal???

Drogba - awesome individual effort
Mata - ref error (shocker!!!)
Ramires - neat finish
Fat Frank - Quality free kick
Malouda - neat finish

comment by Ham Shankly (U12781)
posted 29 minutes ago
Sorry TOOR but that statement is absolute balls mate. Nearly every goal???

Drogba - awesome individual effort
Mata - ref error (shocker!!!)
Ramires - neat finish
Fat Frank - Quality free kick
Malouda - neat finish
-----------------------------------
I can't remember clearly, I was a bit drunk but before the Lampard free-kick was given, Spurs should have had a free kick.

Also if I remember correctly, one came after a corner which before the corner Spurs should have had a free-kick.

The referee also could have send Cech off and given a penalty but played advantage which in fairness is according to the rules.

Mikel should have been sent off.

Also I think it's fair to say if the first incident( the goal line incident) didn't occur, the game could have been very different. Up until Chelsea's goal and even a little after that, Spurs were the better team. The goal line incident changed the game. The referee ruined the game.

Even small decisions were going in Chelsea's favour.

Let's hope the referee is more even for the final.

I'd have to disagree. It was tight in the first half yes but I think Chelsea just edged it, and easily in the second half they were full value for the victory.

Yet again Spurs can't produce when it matters. Bottled it. Yes alright one goal should never have stood, but they beat them by 4 goals!

All that aside anyway, it is Torres destiny to be beaten by the mighty reds yet again! hopefully having just been knocked out the CL we then beat Chelsea to yet another trophy this season!

"comment by Ham Shankly (U12781)
posted 13 hours, 55 minutes ago
I'd have to disagree. It was tight in the first half yes but I think Chelsea just edged it, and easily in the second half they were full value for the victory. "

Yes in the end, they just edged the first half but I'm talking about up until the ghost goal, Spurs were the better side.

"Yet again Spurs can't produce when it matters. Bottled it. Yes alright one goal should never have stood, but they beat them by 4 goals! "

This is the same argument the stupid commentator was making. The whole point is, the game would have been completely different had the referee not given that goal. Firstly, they wouldn't have a goal and secondly Spurs' confidence wouldn't have dropped whilst Chelsea's increased.

"All that aside anyway, it is Torres destiny to be beaten by the mighty reds yet again! hopefully having just been knocked out the CL we then beat Chelsea to yet another trophy this season!"

I hope you're right about Torres getting beaten at Anfield, not on a personal level, just that we beat Chelsea. Torres is not a Liverpool player anymore, I have no love nor hate for him, distant memory.

Also, I don't think Chelsea will be knocked out of the Champions League.