As a Chelsea fan I think that we should not sign Eden Hazard as I think he is overrated and has bad attitude.Also with reports suggesting that he wants to earn 250,000 pounds per week I think we would be better off without him in my opinion.Yes he is a good player and I am OK with Chelsea signing him for 30 million pounds but only if we have a manager who can sort out his attitude and he is ready to lower his wage demands by at least 70000 pounds per week.
Following is dailymail article reporting that Chelsea will break the bank to sign Eden Hazard.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2146882/Chelsea-ready-break-bank-Eden-Hazard.html
Thoughts?Fellow Chelsea fans?
Browse:
We shouldnt sign Hazard as he is overrated
comment by Mr. Unsubscribe (U1110)
posted on 20/5/12
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
comment by JustMatt. What's the Mata? (U9316)
posted on 20/5/12
*next year
comment by Our Bald Manager > Yours (U1641)
posted on 20/5/12
I'd definately prefer Hazard to Hulk. Hulk is known to dive and pester the referee at times, he's not a model pro himself. Not many footballers are
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted on 20/5/12
Gazza, but can we afford it?
comment by Our Bald Manager > Yours (U1641)
posted on 20/5/12
We didnt sign Aguero because of wages. Now we have Kalou on the wing
comment by Mr. Unsubscribe (U1110)
posted on 20/5/12
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Mr. Unsubscribe (U1110)
posted on 20/5/12
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted on 20/5/12
Yes i am. And i was kidding
comment by DTM (U8348)
posted on 11/3/13
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted on 11/3/13
So glad to have been wrong about him. Hazard, Oscar & Mata are gifts from the heavens
RATE THIS ARTICLE
ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available