or to join or start a new Discussion

512 Comments
Article Rating 1.8 Stars

Race Row or...

the looking for trouble anti-racists stirring it up again?

I find it quite astonishing that this cartoon can even be considered racially related. To suggest that it is, actually is more racist than anything, in my opinion. If the person on the building had been white, would the cartoonist be suggesting he's black? Ridiculous.

The cartoonist's obvious ploy was to show big bad Balotelli going against the English attacks and criticisms and fighting them off. To suggest anything racial here is downright ridiculous, in my opinion.

Thoughts?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2165365/Fresh-Euro-2012-race-row-Balotelli-offensive-King-Kong-cartoon-Big-Ben-published-Italian-newspaper.html

posted on 29/6/12

FSB (U11355)



Well said. I'm always going to find it tough to turn a blind eye to those that suffer doubly due to my actions, I will soul search a bit more on this point.

posted on 29/6/12

Ripley's cat

My question sounded patronising. I meant do you agree that the two categories get bundled into one and do you think that any of the responsibility in that lies with us?

comment by FSB (U11355)

posted on 29/6/12

Ripley's, a lot of great points

I think the media are very much to blame in all of this. They thrive by creating a media storm. They actually profit from the propagation of the racist 'link' and the paedophile threat as it gives them an opportunity to take the moral high ground and express their mock indignation whenever stories such as this arise. Thus their main interest is in perpetuating the issue.

posted on 29/6/12

So as ever, the money-driven media are to blame

posted on 30/6/12

Couple of points, why does Ballotelli have bare feet in the image? Also to what extent does the intention of the artist govern the reaction once the picture is made public? If the cartoon was not intended with any racial undercurrent is it unreasonable for a viewer to take offense?? I would assume that the artist didn't intend any racial link as they would've had to justify the image to the editor who then made the decision to publish. For me this was an error of judgement as it could clearly be construed as racist in nature even if there was no intent and in todays PR conscious world to publish anyway was ill-judged. The old maxim that no publicity is bad publicity is clearly nonsense - ask Gerald Ratner!

posted on 30/6/12

Stirling

The artist is free to come out and explain his own work whenever he wishes. If he chooses not to do so, then we can only assume that that is because his intention with this cartoon was to create debate, leave its interpretation open, and, well, kick up a bit of a storm.

If he has come out and explained it, then any interpretation in environments such as this that conflicts with his explanation has quite simply missed the point of his work.

posted on 9/7/12

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 9/7/12



posted on 9/7/12

It's simple supply and demand if you ask me. More people want to buy the white dolls, therefore they're more expensive.

posted on 9/7/12

thats terrible lol!

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 1.8 from 5 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available