Hey fellow blues fans.
I have read a lot on here of people thinking we need a new RB. But do we? I agree we made need some cover in that position. But that does not mean we need to go spending big bucks on a new flashy name (Maicon). In my opinion we have arguably had the best RB in the league over the last 3 years in Ivanovich. (just need to keep madrid away) With the exception of maybe Sagna on occasions. So why not just use money to increase our pot for other positions needed in a creative RW/S and CM. (assuming we are still going to play 4231).
I just think a new fresh young up and coming player that we can use as a backup until Ivanovich moves on (IF) Just don't think it is a priority to go splashing in this position. we can use the likes of Ramires in a more attacking threat or Essien as last resort.
Thoughts
Browse:
Do we really need a new RB?
comment by Our Bald Manager > Yours (U1641)
posted on 2/7/12
Tbf the players we have been linked with haven't been more than 6-7 million
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted on 2/7/12
YES!
comment by Johnny Kills (U1126)
posted on 2/7/12
We do need a new right back, we do not need Maicon.
Its a step backwards, we're developing a younger team, and Debuchy at 26 is the oldest we should be looking at. Not Maicon who is not the greatest person at defending, who is 31 and would command wages of £100,000
comment by Mr. Unsubscribe (U1110)
posted on 2/7/12
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Sheriff JW Pepper (U1007)
posted on 2/7/12
Micah Richards
comment by Super Dan Sturridge ★ (U3816)
posted on 2/7/12
Micah Richards
RATE THIS ARTICLE
ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available