off the official site both look nice i might get either one tbh
http://www.lcfc.com/news/article/100812-away-kit-by-puma-revealed-302793.aspx
what does everyone think?
thansk
SF
New Leceister away + third kits
posted on 10/8/12
So, the white is going to be the 3rd kit
posted on 10/8/12
Both look good, but I'm old enough to remember when refs always wore all black, so the idea of 10 ref looky-likeys running round the park...
posted on 10/8/12
The Black and Gold strip looks quite classy, but i'll wait and see what it looks like in the flesh, so to speak.
The white strip alos looks nice but i won't be buying it as i've got last years away kit which is very similar.
Not a bad effort by Puma though, and their quality will no doubt be better than Burrda
posted on 10/8/12
Yeah it's certainly acceptable, I think having seen the home shirt, we all knew kind of what the away ones would look like.
posted on 10/8/12
Reminds me of the Derby colours?! i'll stick with the blue & white me thinks....
posted on 10/8/12
Come on mate.............get our team name spelt right!
The white kit should be the away kit. Black is too close to royal blue for an away kit. Who chooses the diff colour for away? Did they not realise that home and second kits (away) are both dark??? Numpties.
posted on 10/8/12
Terrible. As others have said, our away kit should be white. I have never understood the obsession with black, it's just a boring colour.
TBH, they're all boring, generic kits, with no collar. They aren't symmetrical either, which makes them ugly like the Topps Tiles one. Why someone would spend more than a tenner on something like that I don't know.
posted on 10/8/12
*Or, I should say, the home one isn't symmetrical.
posted on 10/8/12
I really quite like the black strip - won't buy the white one as it is similar to last year's. There is something about playing in black that I feel is a little intimidating. Perhaps it's my imagination.
posted on 11/8/12
White kit should always be the 2nd and away kit.