or to join or start a new Discussion

27 Comments
Article Rating 1 Star

Falcao Chelsea bound

News filtering through on a 40m bid? Been accepted too.

If its true, I will cry.

I feel like crying. Face palm as I type this.

comment by Gonzo (U15606)

posted on 28/8/12

I should know better, I fecking hate itks. but it was a few AFC posters on twitter I got this from.

Please tell me this is bull and 100% false. Walcott and now this, just give up.

posted on 28/8/12

comment by Serial WUManiser - Disciple of Boy Bastin - Showing Robbing Van Plastic out the Door. (U1410)
posted 22 seconds ago
This can't be true. If it is, we might as well not bother with football anymore. Let the rich feckers play their games until they are tired.
------------------
you lot make me die. You're owned by two billionaire's! It's just that they're both too stubborn to let the other become majority share holder. It's not everyone else's fault that you are a selling club.

comment by Devil (U6522)

posted on 28/8/12

Serial, you know what Falcao represents?

The world's smallest violin

comment by Gonzo (U15606)

posted on 28/8/12

comment by Jack... (U1937)

We are a plc, big difference to how chelsea is run.

comment by Gonzo (U15606)

posted on 28/8/12

Ok not true, then. Phew.

posted on 28/8/12

We are indeed in talks with Athletico no agreement though.
We are also in talks with Porto.
Like I have said we are in for a striker and the preference is Hulk but we are not going to pay over the odds. It is just sense to keep our options open.
Either that or we are trying to force Porto to lower thier asking price.

posted on 28/8/12

comment by AFC-2012 (U15606)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Jack... (U1937)

We are a plc, big difference to how chelsea is run.
------------------
Again, only because you don't have a majority shareholder. Does my head when Arsenal fans moan about us and City. I've got alot gooner mates that do it. Next breath they moan that their club isn't active enough in the market!

You can't tell me that when Usmanov and Kronke started buying shares, you all didn't think 'yes we'll start spending big money on big players now'. Because it hasn't happened you moan in the echo of Mr Wenger. So hypocritical.

comment by Gonzo (U15606)

posted on 28/8/12

Not as a plc. Unless one person owns it, nobody is going to pump money in. Why would Usmanov if Kronke benefits and vice versa.

Roman bears all. Profits and losses. He has no worry of anyone and no one benefits but him.

Still big difference.

posted on 28/8/12

We were a PLC before and after Roman bought us. He took us off about 6 months after purchasing most of the shares. Kronke and Usmanov want to do the same thing at Arsenal but neither can break the power struggle, or the other shareholders.

comment by Gonzo (U15606)

posted on 28/8/12

If Usmanov took over then it could become a play thing for him. But Americans. never. Kronke will do what man u have aNd float the club and pocket the money.

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 1 from 1 vote

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available