It seems to be a particularly common trait among football fans, including those on this board, to write players off after a short period of time, making a short-term judgement on their quality, and in some cases assuming an almost personal vendetta against certain players. And this is my answer to those people.
Robin van Persie:
The writing-off of everyone's favourite Dutchman was not down to any deficit in ability. On the old 606, around this time 2 years ago, the news had broken that RvP had picked up yet another long-term injury. This was one response that I remember well:
'Sell him now, while he still has any resale value. Chamakh has shown he can fill his place upfront, he's more of a natural goalscorer, and we have Bendtner/Vela coming through as well'
Can you imagine?
We all know what happened next. RvP proved he was a world-class striker and footballer by coming back and scoring 19 goals in half a season as the rest of the team crashed in ruins around him, before scoring 37 goals the next campaign, his first full season without injury. Of course he spoiled it afterwards, but that's my first example of why players shouldn't just be consigned to the scrapheap by impatient fans.
Laurent Koscielny:
Kos was pretty much unknown when he joined. He had only had a single season in Ligue 1, and that showed in his mixed start. He looked timid and weak initially, improving a lot in the opening two months of 2011, including a world-class display vs. Barcelona, before it all came crashing down following his horrible mix-up with Szczesny in the CC final that year.
He got plenty of abuse as his performances reverted to early season type, as people said that he was weak, skittish, with no leadership or decision-making skills. One voice on this board stood out though. Most people laughed when Kamran declared him our best defender ahead of Vermaelen. Fast forward to May 2012 and Kos had had a superb season culminating in the crucial final-day winner vs West Brom. He had been adulated as our best defender and first name on the team-sheet through the entire campaign. How times change.
Carl Jenkinson:
Perhaps the most prominent example. Jenkinson arrived from League 1 Charlton for 1 million. No-one expected him to start anything other than CC and maybe FA cup games. Instead he was thrust into the spotlight. Many people condemned him after a horrific display in the 8-2. Kamran may have a good nose for CBs but perhaps not for full-backs: 'If Jenkinson can be a pro footballer for Arsenal then so can I'. He wasn't alone. I myself was sceptical. But can you actually remember a bad game he has had since then? This season he has been excellent, earning praise from all quarters, and there has been talk of an England call-up. Who'd have thought it?
There are others who have been written off and who have come back the stronger. Gibbs. Mertesacker. Diaby. Ramsey.
All these players are now generally accepted as good players with plenty to offer Arsenal, despite Ramsey's poor 2nd half yesterday and Diaby's injuries, even if Rambo still get stick.
Some, such as Gervinho and Walcott, are constantly derided, but still produce relatively good goal/assist returns, Walcott last season, Gerv this season.
The main thrust of this article is towards one man. Olivier Giroud.
He's had a tough time so far. Coming in from a new league, into a very different style of play, taking the position of someone who scored more goals for us than Dennis Bergkamp. Th pressure from fans and media is massive. His finishing has suffered from nerves and a lack of composure. He's not the quickest either and the ball doesn't exactly stick to his feet. But you simply do not score 20 goals in one season if you can't finish. He has shown enough, with his height, power, and movement, that with confidence, and a run of games, he can become a very potent threat in the Premier League.
So let's forget the errors of judgement I dare say we have all mad in the past with regard to Arsenal players, and get behind our big, cuddly Frenchman. And lets drop the personal vendettas against some of our other players as well.
Who's with me?
Writing-Off
posted on 30/9/12
Giroud is a quality player, he's similar to Kos.. both late developers and came from Ligue 2 to Ligue 1 to Arsenal. So it'll just take him some time to settle but we signed him for 4 years not 4 games so it's not a problem.
posted on 30/9/12
I think it's only a matter of time before he hits form. We just need to start playing him, he needs time to really get in the game, he's not an impact sub.
posted on 30/9/12
He's only started 4 games for us, scored 1 goal and made 2 assists. Not bad tbh.
He needs to start games now because Gervinho will ruin 90% attacks even if he manages a goal.
posted on 30/9/12
How are you supposed to supposed to adjust to the league if you don't start. And what are fans supposed to think if you are so average when you do start that you cannot justify a starting place in the next game?
posted on 30/9/12
Plenty of players don't start every game straight after they sign because it can take some of them time to settle. And on the 2nd point, those fans should realise that plenty of players have looked average initially and gone on to be quality.
At the end of the day it doesn't matter than fans think, most people thought Kos was crap and he proved otherwise.
posted on 30/9/12
Am I the only one who thinks Giroud's done reasonably well?
Yes he's missed chances but his movement has opened up oppo defences for others to score several times already this season. Coupled with the fact he's getting in goal scoring positions every game (even during 15 minute sub appearances) shows he's got something about him. The goals will come.
posted on 30/9/12
Plenty of players don't start every game straight after they sign because it can take some of them time to settle.
-------------------------------------
Not in a striker. I remember the adjustment periods of foreign strikers in the past, Dennis, Henry, Wiltord, Kanu, RVP, Adebayor, Eduardo ...even Chmakh. They were all playing and contributing. I don't see the link up play or hold up play that is fundamental. Gervinho has been better up front than Giroud.
I hope he can force his way in and do something special. I just don't see anything Giroud at the moment. And no, the settle excuse does not wash.
Kos was having a good games and awful ones when he first came. He may not have been consistent, and in fact inconsistency has crept back in his game, but he was exceptional at times. I never thought Kos was crap. And I don't think Giroud is crap. I just think he is a mid table striker at best. We needed a top class striker to replace RVP. Our goal scoring has been very very poor from the start of the season.
posted on 30/9/12
And I don't think Giroud is crap. I just think he is a mid table striker at best. We needed a top class striker to replace RVP.
---
I think this comment may come back to haunt you, there is something about giroud but he needs something to click
posted on 30/9/12
Another brilliant article from the OP. All I can say about it its a fair analysis of Giroud situation.
In addition to Giroud situation I like to point out that our team is not playing in his cards. Our crosses to him are awful so far. What can he do when he is not getting the balls? Our team don't use him properly. Yes he missed out some good occasions but I wanted to remember that van Pumps needed 8 years with us to finally develop into a top striker and Giroud are written off by some just after 6 games.
Brilliant OP . Take 5 's from me again.
posted on 30/9/12
I think this comment may come back to haunt you, there is something about giroud but he needs something to click
---------------------------------
I am rarely wrong. Have been posting on some form of 606 since 2005. But in case of Giroud I would be happy to be proven wrong because it will mean his goals will be winning us games.
Just doesn't look close to it at the moment.