Can anyone explain why he wasn't sent off

TalksRubbish

Jagielka - irrlevent. Jagielka could well have been given a straight red for fouling Sterling before Sterling was even booked

What tackle are you talking about? If Osman deserved a yellow card for his first booking,then Sterling should of gone, as it was the same type of foul as Osman's but it would of been his second.

No Osman deserved a SECOND yellow for PERSISTENT fouling.

honestly I struggle to pin down whether you lot are being deliberately evasive to obsure the point I'm trying to make or you really are daft.

No Osman deserved a SECOND yellow for PERSISTENT fouling

So Sterling didn't deserve a second yellow,even tho his foul was similar to Osman's first card. Sterling was getting ripped to bits by Baines and Marillas,so much so that BR switched him to the other wing as he knew he was lucky to still be on the pitch.

I'll repeat one more time...persistent fouling.

I'll repeat one more time...persistent fouling

Didn't do any more than Allen,and like I said,If Osman's first caution deserved a card,then why wasn't Sterling sent off,as his tackle was the similar,but he was already on a yellow? And bringing up Jags and Howard just shows how desperate your getting.

Again, Osmans first yellow was more likely the result of persistent fouling.

The desparation is from the very subject this thread, brought up by your manager to cover up the appalling conduct of his own players, following his self righteous speech no less than a few days earlier.

Again, Osmans first yellow was more likely the result of persistent fouling

You don't even know your guessing. I see you've skated around why Sterling wasn't sent off. Liverpool should of been down to 9 men.

youre just being stupid now

I see you've skated around why Sterling wasn't sent off.