I think you guys are being abit harsh on piney. Let the guy celebrate and air his views on Indian women beating Pakistan. The poor guy must look at the overall head to heads between Pakistan and India and fall into depression mode:
Test – Pakistan 12-9 up
ODIs – Pakistan 69-48 ahead
T20 – Indians 2-1 ahead
50 over world cups = 1-1
T20 world cups = 1-1
The GREAT British brought the gift of cricket to india in 1790s, and the Indians started officially playing tests in 1930s, after errrrrrr ermmmmmm 140 years practicing . Did you know that from the first 200 games india played, they only won 35, that after practicing for 140 years …Little Pakistan was only created in 1947 with paks starting in 1950s.
So despite being a 160 years ahead, if the only thing an Indian can gloat about is some Indian women beating a Pakistani women side in a wishywashy T20 – good luck to you. Congratulations son .
I’d have responded to his article, but he deletes anyone that talks facts and stats
Response for my mate Piney
posted on 1/11/12
Neon, tell me this is a wind up. There was no such thing as Pakistan. They were all Indians. Pakistan didnt blood exsist. Indias official records start in 1930, it's Indian records only. Pakistan didnt exsist fella, I'm just glad the iCC don't think like u otherwise by your logic they'd give Pakistan half your bloody records since then. .
Neon, your lucky I respect my elders and especially those with dementia in care homes
posted on 1/11/12
Did you know that from the first 200 games india played, they only won 35, that after practicing for 140 years
=====================
posted on 1/11/12
Do you understand the stupidty in this??
Pakistan was India
=============
I was thinking this as well actually. Good point
posted on 1/11/12
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 1/11/12
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 1/11/12
Neon, you clearly dont know your history do you? i think you might actually find that india actually became a whole indian state officially in 1947 when the british decided to end its 300+ year rule. Before that it was just seperated and ruled on a state by state, village by village basis - i go back to my original point. Pakistan didnt exsist.
posted on 1/11/12
I was thinking this as well actually. Good point
--
JPB?
posted on 1/11/12
Neon you just got told
posted on 2/11/12
it was called british india. seriously wat r u guys smoking? i know there were states and each state had its kings and bla bla bla, but doesnt change the fact that the whole thing was called british india.
posted on 2/11/12
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator