Who?

Losing Henry was the worst

i can see the threads moved on nevermind

Losing Henry was the worst
----------------------------------------------------
Now i can understand that because at the time he WAS the best in his position, no question.

So who were the better midfielders in the prem at that time Brutus?

Paul scholes
Steven gerrard

But scholes barely created or scored goals. Using your logic he isn't the best in the prem either.

Gerrard? Had one class season, where most of his goals were set pieces.

But scholes barely created or scored goals.
----------------------------------------------------------
That must be the most ill thought out comment iv'e seen on here for a long time.

Scholes at his prime yes but Fabregas was better while he was here.

Forgive me for exaggerating.

As 8bit said, at his prime, maybe.

Maybe.

But while Cesc was here (which is the arguement)? Cesc was better.

We'll have to agree to disagree then, but in my opinion...
Gerrard..............More complete mdfielder,i.e passing, tackling, goals, set pieces
Scholes.............More potent in front of goal, better in the air and just as good a passer of the ball
Cesc...................great passer, clever runs, ability to find space.