Is it possible either Fed or Nads win more slams?
IMHO, Fed is not winning anymore slams. 16 will be it for him.
Nads could win 1 or 2 more slams at best.
Bottom line: Fed will retire with 16 slams and Nads with 10-12 slams.
Djoker should win something like 6-8 slams.
When all is said and done:
Fed: 16 slams
Nads: 10-12 slams
Djoker: 6-8 slams
Murray: Enigma
Del Potro: If he gets back to 2009 levels maybe 4 slams like Vilas
Browse:
Fed, Nads done at winning slams?
posted on 22/7/11
Federer ain't finished yet boyo!
comment by trixx (U8835)
posted on 22/7/11
Comment Deleted by Article Creator
comment by trixx (U8835)
posted on 22/7/11
Fed has not won a slam in almost 2 years...
And in those almost 2 years he has lost to Soderling, Berdych, Djoker, Djoker, Nads, Tsonga at the slams. Too many different players... It's not like when he was just losing to Nads at the slams(2008-2009) and all he needed was Nads losing(USO 2008, FO 2009, Wimbledon 2009, AO 2010) and he could then win a slam. Now he can lose to different players at the slams. I say he is done winning slams.
comment by Exiled_In_Norwich (U1833)
posted on 25/7/11
You forgot Del Potro. Already a Slam winner and i`m sure many others on the way.
comment by JustMatt. What's the Mata? (U9316)
posted on 25/7/11
Murray-Enigma?
Murray- Not good enough
RATE THIS ARTICLE
ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available