Should Fraser Forster Be Englands #1?

Good point tbh

No. Hart would have also saved those Barcalona efforts last night .

no

As a person who watches the SPL and EPL games, I would have to say Forster is now a better GK than Hart. A year ago it was vice versa.

So for me, I would say yes!

comment by 3rdDivHighAndRising (U15339)
posted 13 hours, 43 minutes ago
As a person who watches the SPL and EPL games, I would have to say Forster is now a better GK than Hart. A year ago it was vice versa.

So for me, I would say yes!
Add Comment | Complain about this Comment | Share
---------------



please he is a good stopper, but other than that can't kick, can't catch and for a man of his size does not dominate his area as well as he should.
There is a very good reason why we sold him off on the cheap and kept krul.

I think Pardew made a mistake on that one the boy has progresses brilliantly and is getting better and better.

And I am a Rangers fan, so coming from me that says something!

Forster has improved immeasurably in the past two seasons. He has the full package now.

As far as catching the ball, do you see any goalkeeper in the modern age do that? No. They're all trained to push it away from goal these days.

Forster has been so consistent, has not been making the mistakes that Hart has through complacency and fully deserves his debut.

It woud also let Hart know that he's not untouchable, making him raise his game.

They don't call him La Gran Muralla in Spain for nothing

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=83gddxVpitc&list=AL94UKMTqg-9AlGjPjGESqM3e8oEp6DQGQ