Danns out on loan

I have no issue with any player going to any team.

If they were genuinely good enough to male a difference to that team, they'd be in our first team.

Same for Danns. Send him to Cardiff, forest or palace for all I care. The only reason we'll be promoted or not this year is based on our own results, not 1 player in 1 rival team.

Perspective people!

Looks as though he's gone to bristol city for a month

One caveat to my statement above. If the player in question is actually your nest player and wants out, you should never loan or sell him to a rival.

If they are a top player, it's a matter of principle and that they would strengthen your rival.

For example, Cristiano Ronaldo IS good enough to improve a team by himself which is why Real Madrid would never sell him to us.

I'd have no issue with us lending some of our players out - particularly Waghorn, James and Vardy !!

They all need to gain experience where there is less pressure - somewhere like Division 1.

Bristol City? After the way they treated us over the Maynard saga?

I'd tell them to do one and then flood their forum with endless posts about how the player refuses to play for another Championship club.

"If another club got said striker, he would be eligible to play against Man Utd and they would therefore lose that advantage."

The earth has stopped spinning on its axis. The one i call Dung is wrong! Man Utd like leicester have done will have a clause in thier contract which means they wont be able to play against them... Will the world ever be the same again.

"Dung on the other sied its not unknown for Man Utd to try and sign a striker to stop other clubs from getting them."
>
"If another club got said striker, he would be eligible to play against Man Utd and they would therefore lose that advantage."

That was merely a response to your comment directly above. I wasn't talking about a loanee, I was replying to your point about (the frankly rare situation of) Man Utd buying up players to stop their rivals from getting them. Explain what's technically wrong with what I put.

Dunge,

I’ve seen people explain Einstein’s theory of General Relativity using less complex analogies than you’ve used in this thread.

"I’ve seen people explain Einstein’s theory of General Relativity using less complex analogies than you’ve used in this thread."

----------------

Pfft. I'm not even going to begin telling you where that's wrong.

I'm not sure about General Relativity, but Professor Pearson appears to have rejected its widely accepted sister theory of General Goalscoring which states b = mw10