It's clear AW has modelled our youth set-up on Barcelona. It's also clear that we develop few top players (eg Wilshere) but we churn out lots of mid-table Premiership quality young players (eg Larson) and ample Championship players (eg Simpson). We seem to get small but tidy little sums of money for these players: a few million here, a few million there.
My question to my fellow 606ers is: Is this economically viable? I.e once you take away the cost of developing and training them are we making a profit? I bet we are, but it would be nice to know the figures.
Profit margin from our academy
posted on 23/7/11
Will Arsenal fans be happy with the not winning anything but playing great football trophy again this season?
posted on 23/7/11
I was under the impression that you actually spent a fair amount on young players, i mean for their age of course.
I wouldn't be surprised if you were only breaking even,
posted on 23/7/11
lol we probably break even just from selling players such as bentley, upson etc, etc, etc. could name you plenty. they also have sell on clauses...we got £4m from blackburn when tottenham bought bentley for example.
and then you have a guy with the value of fabregas and you wonder whether we break even lol. whether we sell him or not isn't significant because he is a £40m asset.
then toure, clichy, bentdner etc. etc. etc. who were pretty much freebies who provide decent service and then make a few million when we don't want then any more.
posted on 24/7/11
It's clear AW has modelled our youth set-up on Barcelona.
---------------------------------------------------
Yes ofcourse he has, because Barcelona recruit and nurture their young talent from an early age and errrrrrrrr Arsenal go around poaching these young talents when they turn 16. Yep both are exactly the same...
posted on 24/7/11
comment by N-N-N-Nineteen
he meant modelled on barca in terms of how young players are trained. barca, and united both have plenty of foreign kids in their academy who are 'poached'. try not being an ass for a change, it might help with your rage issues and you might get some mates
posted on 24/7/11
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 24/7/11
Tex: Without getting too pedantic I actually said "few" not "a few" but if you are looking for another example you only have to look at the LB in your team.
Not many teams in the world develop true high class homegrown players (eg Barca brought Messi over from Argentina). Even at Arsenal if you were to take top quality local talent developed you would have to go back to Tony Adams et al. A lot of this comes down to luck; Man U lucked out when they got the Scholes, Giggs etc cohort, but haven't really brought through anyone since. And that's why we get in young players from all over the world.
posted on 24/7/11
I recall a show on TV featuring Wenger and a younger Fabregas. Wenger was going on about his youth policy and said that by the time an academy player gets to 25, total expenditure is similar to a cash purchase. Looking at our current lot, it's obviously not working.
posted on 24/7/11
V interesting last post
posted on 24/7/11
@NautiusAlot. Right now I'd be thrilled if we went back to ''playing great football''. The other trophies will surely follow. COYG!