I'm being a little mischievous as a Liverpool fan here, but many people level the argument that chelsea have no history, and other clubs (liverpool, arsenal, man united) have got some history.
(Aside from the obvious notion that anything which exists for any length of time has history in the truest sense) can we now say chelsea now have some history?
In the last decade, chelsea have won a few league titles, FA Cups, and the European cup that I can think of. That represents a pretty good return to me and I think there are enough moments to class as history? Otherwise what is the criteria?
HAVE CHELSEA NOW 'GOT' SOME HISTORY?
posted on 4/12/12
Another witty comment
posted on 4/12/12
No wonder Ken Dodd still works
posted on 4/12/12
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 4/12/12
Doubt Tarby's his script writer!!
posted on 4/12/12
no need to leave yet Metro, we have plenty more bait here for you to bite on................
posted on 4/12/12
He might be Tarby's bog cleaner though Brummie
posted on 4/12/12
John Bishop
posted on 4/12/12
John Bishop - Now he's funny - obviously not related to 'The Great Metropolis' though!!
posted on 5/12/12
comment by Aggers Right Elbow, Agger says "Chelsea must Respect Rafa's authority! Fahkt!' (U3402)
posted 7 hours, 18 minutes ago
Chelsea do now have a history, as the only club in the Premiership who have a ghost manager who picks the side and signs the players.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Given what happened with you lot when you gave Kenny full control, im glad our managers don't
posted on 5/12/12
believe it or not. steven gerrard has actually managed to get his hands on the league title! here is the proof!
http://sillyseason.com/football/premier-league/liverpool-fc/articles/pic-day-steven-gerrard-made-pose-everton-shirt