or to join or start a new Discussion

22 Comments
Article Rating 3.67 Stars

Waghorn, Maynard, Bristol.

Jason Bourne, a radio Leicester presenter has posted this on his twitter;

jasonbourne1986 Jason Bourne
Would you be happy with letting Waghorn leave as part of a deal to bring in Maynard from Bristol City? Personally, I think I would. #LCFC.

jasonbourne1986 Jason Bourne
Daily Mirror: #LCFC will offer £4m and Martyn Waghorn for Bristol City striker Nicky Maynard.



Does he know something we don't? How would you feel about the deal. If true that is.



Anyway, less that two weeks to go !

posted on 26/7/11

Horses for courses chaps.

Firstly, Waghorn would most likely play every minute of every game for them. He wouldn't come close to that for us.

Secondly, he would most likely be their main source of goals and so each and every attack would generally see him at the end of it. That wouldn't happen here.

Its like Fryatt and Hobbs, i've no doubt they will be top players this season. But if they were still here they wouldn't even get a 10 minute run out.

posted on 26/7/11

The buyer at work (in Leeds), who by the nature of his job has very good contacts just telephoned this one to me quoting "a very reliable source" I hadn't discussed the rumour with him

comment by Fox_14 (U2869)

posted on 26/7/11

Doc Fox, if Waggy was THAT good and could score goals for fun at this level, don't you think he'd be our main striker and not a makeweight in a deal to bring another striker in??

In any case, I'd rather we offered them £4.5mil and Howard. I do think Waggy would be useful back-up to bring off the bench when a defence is starting to get a bit tired.

posted on 26/7/11

I'm not doubting that Waggy is good and believe he has bags of potential. I even believe that he could do a great job for us given the chance.

But thats where the problem lies, he won't be given that chance with us.

And again i reiterate my point, that within a team with arguably less goalscorers than us, he would score for fun purely based on the amount of gametime and the amount of individual chances he would be given.

comment by (U9344)

posted on 26/7/11

this is true, and i found this out last week

what is also true is derbyshire is signing today or tomorrow

comment by Fox_14 (U2869)

posted on 26/7/11

Fair enough then Doc Fox.

Hey, we could sign Waggy on loan, then sign him permanently, then sell him for a loss and then sign him again for twice as much when he's the top scorer in the league!



Bring back Peter Taylor, all is forgiven!!!

posted on 26/7/11

Ha i agree, it makes ludicrous business sense!!

posted on 26/7/11

That is exactly what frustrates me Fox_14

Waghorn can come good, we've already seen it before

posted on 26/7/11

Personally I'd sooner see Waggy go to BCFC than Howard.

I reckon that Sven sees in Howard what, as England manager, he used to see in Heskey - a big strong guy, and a good keeper- and layer- off of the ball when spear-heading up front. And maybe with a better eye for goal than (anyway today's) Heskey. Four last week won't have done Howard any harm, even against that opposition. Goals are goals.

I doubt that Sven sees any of that in Waggy, or that he sees much else either, beyond spirit and commitment, and a genuinely nice guy. I do think some of us are letting our hearts rule our heads, where Waggy is concerned.

But anyway, we shall see.....

posted on 26/7/11

Im sorry but waghorn would not be our main source of goals infact i would dount hed get the nod over pitman and stead (if maynard were to leave)

Maynard will not go to leicester

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 3.67 from 3 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available