Where's the sense in this...

talk about where's the sense watch the game last night and i can not see the sense in playing that miles addison from derby, he is slow can not tackle and his reading of the game is non exsistent

Budred, Addison has just come back from a major injury so hes bound to be a little rusty. When he hits full fitness he is known to really fight for the ball (I remember a Derby fan mentioning this in an earlier thread).

I'm hoping that he starts to pick up soon and am a little gutted that we are being used to bring this guy back to full fitness before sending him back at Christmas.

Hopefully if he isn't up to scratch Hill wont play him in any league games.

then he should not be at oakwell getting match fitness he should be back at derby until fit., we need our own holding midfield player to establish himself

I agree with you on this budred but Hill obviously thinks he can get Addison back to his best pretty quickly and I will admit that last night I saw it as Hill using the match to let Addison try and regain match fitness without costing us anything.

Am I being too optimistic? Maybe, but I cannot see Hill keeping an unfit bloke in the first team for any of our league matches.

I didn't intend my OP as a slight against the lad, but I could have sworn I saw an article ( possibly related to Tripps) where Mr Hill said something like ( and don't quote me on this 'cos my memory ain't what it used to be) " I don't like to look to the past ... I'm more interested in the future".

Sounds like a reyt boomerang

Poor owd Dry...

Poor owd Dry...

He's the f...king boomerang.

He used to be Dry Owl, but methinks that by dropping the Owl bit and residing on our forum he secretly wants to be a Red.

He should be known as Cuckoo...

Poor owd Dry, will be richer owd Dry ( betting man )..

..If yer stop up..

..took the odds, when at their best..

.. Cuckoo

Poor owd Dry...