It's Modric not Pastore

You do realise that Modric is not for sale at the moment, right?
You also do realise there are more chances of signing Pastore than Modric, right?
So if you've agreed to the above facts, why do you then think Chelsea will sign a player that his Club are not willing to sell for any price, than a player who his Club have intentions of raising funds from his sale?

Food for thought!

bloodyblu4cfc.com
Every one has their price.

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

oh hear we go, you chelsea fans don't give in do you. How many times do our club have to explain to you "he's not for sale" .... I think you should move on because your club look like they have. Rumours going round that Modric is sticking all the blame on his agent saying he's been badly advised.....A u turn looks likey i'm afraid chelsea fans

While I respect Spurs' stance on the matter it's hardly bad advice for an agent to want to get his client into a side that qualifies for the Champions League season in season out. I'd actually say it's quite the opposite.....

badly advised in the way he's gone about it in terms of speaking out against the club.....that's badly advised especially when you have just signed a new 6 yr contract He's hardly playing for a rubbish club at spurs is he? And we got ambition to get back in CL

No doubt the ambition is there but I think it'll be a tough fight to get a top four finish especially with the probable scouse resurgence.

Still have nightmares about Vucinic's performance against us in Champions League though so maybe he'd provide the push you need.

I still think there are a few more twists to this Modric story though and they'll probably go into overload when we get back from Asia after Saturday's game.

Well this Vucinic is definet spurs one day then definet Juventus another, it's getting rather tedious and wish we would just hurry up and sign him.....see what happens mate on both fronts ( Modric and Vucinic)

Don