Evening gents (and of course, ladies).
A genuine question if I may?
The article below talks a bit about the arbitration process with regards to fees for the players that's walked away from Rangers, but I keep seeing Aluko's name mentioned whenever its discussed.
Wasn't he only on a short term deal anyway (having paid part of his fee as well if I remember correctly)? What's their claim on him?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/21268775
Browse:
Genuinely Puzzled...
comment by Mitre_Mouldmaster (U13206)
posted on 30/1/13
Was a 1 year deal with the club having the option to extend for a further 2 years. Rangers wished to extend making it a 3 year deal.
Out of all the players, i would not wish to see Aluko held to this though.
comment by Norfolk & Chance (U15892)
posted on 30/1/13
I see.
Thank you sir.
comment by Mitre_Mouldmaster (U13206)
posted on 30/1/13
No worries, happy to help.
RATE THIS ARTICLE
ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available