Positives
At least the board can now see the lack of quality within the ranks, Wenger surely did and it will bring our players down to earth.We have a long way just to even reach the heights of the 2007-2008 team.
No sign of the majority shareholder, the guy makes me sick and I dont even know him.
Negatives
When the storm blows over, Wenger will still be the manager next season(something Im not too fussed about) and there will be little or no investment in the team.
As poor as Vermaelan,Mert and Sagna were, they had little protection and the team defended poorly.Hard to blame Sczeney even though his confidence is slowly ebbing away.
This wonderful Bayern team, and that 1st half was stunning, I cant see them win the champions league, they dont take their opportunities and along the way they will meet another Chelsea and lose.
We lost to the 2nd best side in europe!
posted on 19/2/13
ok, Sir bubbly, whats your point really?
That Bayern arent the 2nd best side in europe? im sure if you took that stat index it would show byern behind barca anyway.Yes no trophies but just like Barca probably will win the Bundesliga
posted on 19/2/13
comment by Riffshire007 (U4133)
posted 3 minutes ago
Sir bubbly your comment blew itself out of the water when you put City in fourth with Bayern lol City aren't even in the top 10 clubs in Europe
---------------
I know I was, but they are in the 10 teams in Europe
posted on 19/2/13
Barca
Bayern
Real
Dortmund
United
Juventus
Porto
PSG
Arsenal
Chelsea
Dont quite think City are in the top 10
posted on 19/2/13
comment by Cescy (U14126)
posted 3 seconds ago
ok, Sir bubbly, whats your point really?
That Bayern arent the 2nd best side in europe? im sure if you took that stat index it would show byern behind barca anyway.Yes no trophies but just like Barca probably will win the Bundesliga
-----------------------
I'm saying they're the best team in Europe if they win their League and the CL, I'll gladly say they are better than Barca, because the sheer facts say so.
I'm saying I don't consider small stats before a season has even finished enough evidence to say which team is better than which.
A league title and CL double is unquestionable evidence of being the best team in Europe.
Last year Chelsea won the CL, and finished 6th, Real and City won their leagues, so last season it was hard to say, so I use the past 5 years, you have Barca. But in any 1 season it can be anyone, and this year it will unquestionably be Bayern if they win those 2 trophies, not by how many goals they concede
posted on 19/2/13
Porto, PSG, Arsenal, and Chelsea are better than City? Are you going to admit like I did, that you're being silly?
posted on 19/2/13
in europe Porto Arsenal and chelsea are better than City.
bubbles, you need experience to win games in europe and avoid defeats on your travels.Its not about assembling expensive teams.
city were embarassed by Dortmun, ok Dortmund also embarassed Real but failing to beat Ajax at home is criminal.City are not even cloise to porto
posted on 19/2/13
Its not about assembling expensive teams.
--------------
Isn't that what Real and Chelsea have done?
posted on 19/2/13
meant its not ONLY about assembling expensive sides.
Leave Real out of this, they are the most successful european side, Chelsea are expensively assembled but have experience in europe, something City dont have
posted on 19/2/13
cescy other then quite a few of these players played in champions league finals and won the competition In fact most of man city players squad have played in knockout stage of champions league regularlu but can't at man city as they are to slow with the ball and don't run as hard as the top teams.
posted on 19/2/13
most city players have played knock out stage????
name them hafijur?