Match Ratings

They are pointless because all they don't show how ineffective he was (by no means the only player at fault before you jump on me). He was tidy, didn't create much danger and dithered on the ball a few times when we were attacking.
-
i didnt say he didnt do those things, i was just proving the 'he gave it away alot' statement wrong.

Wilshere 2, fack right off

So why the *relatively* high score?

Wilshere had the most successful dribbles and I believe joint most key passes. Yet he was $hit, fack off.

Wilshere wasn't very good tbf. 2 is obviously stupidly harsh (think the OP is trying to make a point in favour of Ramsey as always, i.e. Ramsey 7, Jack and Arteta 2). The one thing he had going for him is that he didn't go missing and kept on trying to make things happen, alas to no avail. Wasn't a good day for him.

Wilshere was below par - but he was still a bit better than Ramsey - Rosicky when he came on was better than all of them

Ramsey wasn't as good as Jenkinson, who was by far our best player, I'd give Rambo a 6 and Jenkinson 7.5. A 1 for Giroud is unnecessarily harsh.

Rosicky was poor apart from a couple of passes

My word! Did someone say Jack was better than Ramsey? Wilshere can score 9 own goals but people here will still build alters for him in their backyards.

"Rosicky was poor apart from a couple of passes"
====================================

That's funny stuff - I assume you thought Bale was rubbish too