We would have gone for Ba

comment by Arsene Wengooner (U6031)
posted 8 seconds ago
Giroud holds the ball up as well as anyone I've ever seen.
-------------------------------
Really?!

The ball bounces off him at all kinds of paces. When he does actually hold it up of the chest of something, he knees it down and volleys it over the bar from forty yards out. He's crap.

TOOR

I wasn't so much talking about his first touch, but rather the fact that whenever the ball goes up he wins it nearly every time, usually against CBs who you'd expect to just push him out of the way. Whether once it's won he 'donkey's' it off somewhere unintended is up for debate!

comment by Arsene Wengooner (U6031)
posted 1 minute ago
TOOR

I wasn't so much talking about his first touch, but rather the fact that whenever the ball goes up he wins it nearly every time, usually against CBs who you'd expect to just push him out of the way. Whether once it's won he 'donkey's' it off somewhere unintended is up for debate!
---------------------------------
Yeah, a lot of the time he wins it but does nothing with it. That's the problem.

Ba's better than Giroud. But he's not that good himself.

^This

Ba is better than Giroud but Ba would have suited Arsenal much more than Chelsea and Giroud would have suited Chelsea much more than Arsenal.

http://pbs.twimg.com/media/BDYzM6VCMAA41up.jpg

Thank you all. My point is very clear. Ba is a better option than we have

Is it true Gervinho cost £11m?

After a defeat its all doom and gloom.