or to join or start a new Discussion

32 Comments
Article Rating     Not Rated Yet

Dodgy Chuck

Like Whyte, Nanny McPhee is a shyster.

Who would seriously invest in the puddle if piiss that is Rangers?

posted on 6/4/13

Put it into google with rangers added to it.

You can also do "rangers fc owners" that brings up many more. Including billionaire mike Ashley

posted on 6/4/13

"Put it into google with rangers added to it.

You can also do "rangers fc owners" that brings up many more. Including billionaire mike Ashley "

If I put Ally McCoist and added sucks how many hits do you think I'd get? What's your point?

posted on 6/4/13

Read the thread

Fairly obvious.

posted on 6/4/13

iE. sorry but when you mentioned an Internet search I had assumed you meant companies house or something of that nature. If I had known you meant a search of Internet piffle I wouldn't have asked. You do know that just because it's on the Internet it isn't necessarily true?

posted on 6/4/13

If it is so easy to find, it should be easy enough to post a link.

I've found two sites, STV and the Daily Record, that post figures of what is owned by who. It adds up to 61.7% and 65.3% respectively

http://local.stv.tv/glasgow/204258-rangers-reveal-newscastle-owner-mike-ashley-among-major-investors/

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/arif-naqvi-has-invested-2m-into-rangers-1278896

On average that's 36.5% of shares missing. That's a majority share holder

posted on 6/4/13

Piffle?

Yet you believe whytey the shyster magnum?
Check the guys companies out on companies house if you wish magnum. I've no doubt the guy is credible and worth a schiedtload of money .


I have no worries whatsoever that green is legit. He told Whyte what he had to. Whyte got pushed out. Simple as that.

posted on 6/4/13

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 6/4/13

Two old and contradictory reports. Who cares. I'm off to get ready for the game. Yesterday Charlie said that he was The biggest shareholder with 8% so it looks like theres been a lot of change recently.

posted on 6/4/13

So what is YOUR take then, IE?

What do you think the reason behind Green's duplicity is? ???

Do you think that the sale of the assets to him by D&P was all above board (if so why do you think it was necessary for him to meet Wido/Wydo?)? Yes. He needed whytes shares if the Cva was successful. It wasn't so Whyte was no longer needed.

Do oyu think the share prospectus/issue was all above board, and needs no investigation? Yes. Not seen anything to suggest it wasn't .

Do you think Green has misled you and the rest of the Berz AT ALL? - and what about Ally/Walter? No more than any other chief exec "misleads" the fans. What about ally n Walter?

posted on 6/4/13

Magnum - the shares were diluted. Green owned around 16 percent but when share thing was complete it diluted the shares down

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 0 from 0 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available