Like Whyte, Nanny McPhee is a shyster.
Who would seriously invest in the puddle if piiss that is Rangers?
Dodgy Chuck
posted on 6/4/13
Put it into google with rangers added to it.
You can also do "rangers fc owners" that brings up many more. Including billionaire mike Ashley
posted on 6/4/13
"Put it into google with rangers added to it.
You can also do "rangers fc owners" that brings up many more. Including billionaire mike Ashley "
If I put Ally McCoist and added sucks how many hits do you think I'd get? What's your point?
posted on 6/4/13
Read the thread
Fairly obvious.
posted on 6/4/13
iE. sorry but when you mentioned an Internet search I had assumed you meant companies house or something of that nature. If I had known you meant a search of Internet piffle I wouldn't have asked. You do know that just because it's on the Internet it isn't necessarily true?
posted on 6/4/13
If it is so easy to find, it should be easy enough to post a link.
I've found two sites, STV and the Daily Record, that post figures of what is owned by who. It adds up to 61.7% and 65.3% respectively
http://local.stv.tv/glasgow/204258-rangers-reveal-newscastle-owner-mike-ashley-among-major-investors/
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/arif-naqvi-has-invested-2m-into-rangers-1278896
On average that's 36.5% of shares missing. That's a majority share holder
posted on 6/4/13
Piffle?
Yet you believe whytey the shyster magnum?
Check the guys companies out on companies house if you wish magnum. I've no doubt the guy is credible and worth a schiedtload of money .
I have no worries whatsoever that green is legit. He told Whyte what he had to. Whyte got pushed out. Simple as that.
posted on 6/4/13
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 6/4/13
Two old and contradictory reports. Who cares. I'm off to get ready for the game. Yesterday Charlie said that he was The biggest shareholder with 8% so it looks like theres been a lot of change recently.
posted on 6/4/13
So what is YOUR take then, IE?
What do you think the reason behind Green's duplicity is? ???
Do you think that the sale of the assets to him by D&P was all above board (if so why do you think it was necessary for him to meet Wido/Wydo?)? Yes. He needed whytes shares if the Cva was successful. It wasn't so Whyte was no longer needed.
Do oyu think the share prospectus/issue was all above board, and needs no investigation? Yes. Not seen anything to suggest it wasn't .
Do you think Green has misled you and the rest of the Berz AT ALL? - and what about Ally/Walter? No more than any other chief exec "misleads" the fans. What about ally n Walter?
posted on 6/4/13
Magnum - the shares were diluted. Green owned around 16 percent but when share thing was complete it diluted the shares down