Stv on Charles Green

Hope yir boaby's fvckin sore.

its fackin agony

Didn't see the program and I do believe there's a bit of a witchunt against green going on in the media, but, my understanding is the same as tafkas.

The assets were sold to sev co 5088 then transferred to sev co Scotland a few days later. This would probably leave green n co on dodgy grounds?!?

I have backed green and said all along I would until something properly negative came out, which it now is starting to IMO.

Just when you think how desperate Whyte was to get dnp, then green just appearing from nowhere with Whytes shares.

Whether Whyte n green are still working together , or green bumped Whyte , there is defo something a wee bit fishy IMO.

If it turns out green has bumped Whyte , I won't be too bothered. But the legalities of it all may be a problem

Here is an extract from the D&P interim report dated 10 July 2012:

"4.1 The Club continued to trade under the control of the Joint Administrators up to the date of the sale of the business and assets of the Company to Se vco on 14 June 2012."

"Se vco" is defined in the report as: "Se vco Scotland Limited of Ibrox Stadium, Glasgow G51 2XD (Company number SC425159)"

In the D&P final report dated 27 September 2012, they stated:

"7.1 A detailed outline of the marketing process undertaken by the Joint Administrators which preceded the sale of the business, history and certain assets of the Club to Newco on 14 June 2012, was provided in the previous report to creditors dated 10 July 2012."

"Newco" is defined in this report as "The Rangers Football Club Limited (Formerly Se vco Scotland Limited) of Ibrox Stadium, Glasgow G51 2XD (Company number SC425159)"

Going by this the sellers ie the administrators never at any time sold the business to se v co 5088.

Duke looks that way from what's been posted there, but I do seem to remember at the time the sale went thru it was transferred from one sev co to the other?!? Hope I'm wrong but as I've posted, a few things are really not starting to add up for me.

IE

A lot of confusion on this and even a 'Rangers spokesman' got it wrong at the time.

Duke - saw that appear last night on RM - interesting stuff.

And now it has been emailed to various journos, there really can be no excuse for getting this wrong.

I predict that the papers will now round on Whyte again, selling yet more copies.

Simple idea - sell copies to one half of Scotland with "Whyte says this" "Whyte could get the keys to Ibrox" etc., then have to go with the facts which reverse everything they previously said.

And we fall into the trap of believing them EVERY feckin time.

I'm very confused

I understand green had to deal with Whyte to get shares pre Cva, so I'm not bothered by the whole green and Whyte meetings drivel that the press is going on about , not am I bothered if green dine the dirty on Whyte, it's just more how the legalities of it all goes.


Could all be nothing as Whyte is a proven liar, I just don't know

IE - no confusion at all now - all perfectly clear. See my OP using Duke's comments and others over the past day.

I actually don't care if Green was put up to buy the club initially by Whyte. As it's clear he has nothing to do with the guy now.

The media in our backward little nation has nothing to write about bar Mrs MacDoogle being robbed in the post office in Inverness.

Our so called country has half the population of London and needs to create stories to sell papers and get them a job in the UK national press.

As we saw all summer when just about everyone of them lied bar Traynor to put the boot into Rangers and ignoring the actual facts.

Our media is a joke!