Mata >>>>>

Randomer any evidence to back that statement up?

Mata is Silva with an end product.

A more effective, generally better player.

Silva is much better than Mata.

Cesar Azpilicueta (U1266)

I like your name.

JNR any time there is a player comparison you bring up talent for example Oscar and Mata.

Randomer Oscar and Mata is a specific example because I always like to point that in the future Oscar will be better than Mata.

Mata is streets ahead of cazorla, cazorla has too many poor games, mata would get my vote for player of the season.

I cant think of any Spanish player whos more consistent than Mata. Hes so underrated.

Consistency and end product are the biggest issues with midfielders, but not a problem for Mata.

"I don't know what's the hype about Silva..he is surrounded by much technical players than us . This year Mata had Mazacar and he did alright.

if he has Tevez and Aguero to do flicky flicky he will be on different level"

Why are you acting like Mata plays in a pub team? He's got Oscar and Hazard alongside him.

Cazorla would be lethal alongside those two.

"JNR still living in the world where talent is more important than efficiency"

Talent is what usually separates the best players from the pedestrians.
'Efficiency?' As in stats and goals scored? Usually means that.
There's more to football than just that.

Talent is pointless if not supplemented with hard work. And no I didn't mean stats when I said efficiency. Mata is a lot more than just stats

Anyway it's not like he is lacking talent, and he is currently better than Oscar, Cazorla and Silva.