Me and my friends were having this argument the other day, i will like you guys to help me out as well. WHO IS BETTER, A FULLY FIT ROSICKY OR FULLY FIT WILSHERE? Thanks guys
posted on 7/5/13
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 7/5/13
Rosicky on his day is top class. But both injury prone as hell.
posted on 7/5/13
Rosicky. He's a joy to watch when on form. Such a shame he's suffered so many injuries. Great player.
posted on 7/5/13
Agree with DJ.
posted on 7/5/13
It's such a shame that injuries have been a skid mark on TR7's career.
The reality is, that in the current midfield set-up, Rosicky is often more effective than Wilshere. However, I believe Wilshere to be a better player.
The crazy thing is, for my money, the most effective midfield Arsenal have put out lately is that of;
Rosicky - Arteta - Ramsey
Now I don't believe for one second that ability wise, that trio is the best Arsenal have to offer. But in terms of having some kind of genuine 'balance', it's the most effective.
I honestly believe Wenger understands the midfield needs sorting out and will do so this summer. Players Wilshere and Santi could shine so much more simply by having a natural ballwinner anchoring that midfield.
posted on 7/5/13
Rosicky is the only good thing at present in our midfield.
We have far more fluid when he plays and yes rosicky is currently better
posted on 7/5/13
Agree with DJ
posted on 7/5/13
different type of players at different stages of their career.
posted on 7/5/13
Rosicky could have been world-class without injuries, even after an injury-plagued career he is still very good.
posted on 7/5/13
We need to sign Lars Bender and Diame. Doesn't Diame still have a 3.5 million release clause?
20 Million for both and we would have a very strong midfield with good rotation options.