Davis,Jackett,McClaren all drifting,
Coyle shortening as is Pulis and Weir.
So it's not over yet,as was reported earlier.
Latest Odds
posted on 24/5/13
As Mark Hughes is "in the frame" for the Stoke job; I strongly think that they may-well be relegated at some point soon.
posted on 24/5/13
mark hughes
hopelessly out of his depth Welshmen with a knack for taking teams towards relegation
dean saunders
see above
posted on 24/5/13
Cant argue with those points gb. Pulis has done a fabulous job for Stoke in terms of their results. But I sincerely hope that Wolves don't go down the route that Pulis and Allardyce and McLeish and others follow of the results are all that matters and sod the quality. If I didnt go to the games then I wouldn't be bothered but as I do go I would rather watch a team with the likes of Kightly, Jarvis, Fletcher and Doyle and be criticised for conceding too many, than be a team that only offers a goal threat from throw ins and corners.
posted on 24/5/13
"If I didnt go to the games then I wouldn't be bothered"
Jesus, That is so obviously a massive dig at WITSS and Cinc, you just cannot help yourself can you? Burying these little barbs in otherwise perfectly innocuous comments just to look sensible. We see you Crikey, we see you.
posted on 24/5/13
Actually it wasn't a dig at them at all (honest guv). There are many on here that can't go to games. And if my circumstances changed and I stopped going to games then I guess it wouldn't be too important to me how they won as long as they won
posted on 24/5/13
I was only joking Crikey. I remember WITSS was upset when you last said something about people who didn't go to games not having so much investment in our style of play, a comment I totally agreed with.
posted on 24/5/13
Its true Ulf. If all that mattered was the results I would watch games on teletext rather than pay £400. And there were times during Stale's reign where teletext would have looked like a much more entertaining style of football
posted on 24/5/13
There's a huge difference with people not being able to go to games because of where they live and those that cannot go to games because of financial restraints.
Then of course there are the STH and those in between who go to the odd game now and then.
It appears to me that for someone to brag about going to every game, is somewhat being a wee bit pompous and big headed.
At the end of the day, we all support Wolves and are entitled to have opinions, whether we see the matches live, watch them on TV or don't/cannot go to games and rely on reports from the media and others.
posted on 24/5/13
If the cap fits...
posted on 24/5/13
The issue if WHY people don't go to games wasn't brought up by Crikey this time or the last. it is a complete non-issue as far as this debate is concerned.
That said, I would never criticise someone for not going to games, with two caveats:
1. I would be impressed if someone goes to every game, it is a hell of a commitment and I would give their views a great deal more weight because of it.
2. I would have absolutely no issue whatsoever with a fan who has never once been to a Wolves game or even seen one on TV. BUT - it would irritate me if that person didn't allow for that fact when debating stuff. For example, singling out a player for heavy criticism. If you haven't been to games, you can't possibly make judgments more extreme than the most extreme found in the media.