Tyre Test Gate - Live Thread

here have obviously been a lot of written, and oral, submissions for the Tribunal panel to deliberate on since last night, so perhaps it really shouldn't be too much of a surprise that the outcome has taken this long to come out so far. One suggestion has been that perhaps the Tribunal have been taking extra care to ensure that whatever their verdict is isn't likely to be appealed/challenged given there are so many clearly complex issues at play in the case.

A VERDICT IS EXPECTED SHORTLY

The official verdict:

Decision of the International Tribunal

The Tribunal, after having heard the parties and examined their submissions, decided that:

Mercedes be reprimanded;
Mercedes be suspended from participating in the forthcoming “three day young driver training test”;
Pirelli be reprimanded.
and rejected all other and further conclusions.

Slap on the wrist, fair enough.

I think that is fair.

Well thank god thats over

Yay

Horner

Mercedes have been banned from this year's young driver test and reprimanded for taking part in a controversial Pirelli tyre test.
Pirelli has also been reprimanded for its role in Lewis Hamilton's team running a 2013 car at the three-day test in Spain last month.
An FIA tribunal found Mercedes in breach of F1's rules and an article bringing the sport into disrepute.
It took into account that the FIA had given "qualified approval" to the test.
The young driver test runs for three days at Silverstone from 17-19 July. Last year, Mercedes completed 1,354 kilometres in the rookie test. The Pirelli test, conducted with race drivers Lewis Hamilton and Nico Rosberg at the Circuit de Catalunya on 15-17 May, ran for 1,000km.
Costs of the investigation and international tribunal procedure have been shared equally between Mercedes, Pirelli and governing body the FIA.
The tribunal said that:
Mercedes had broken article 22.4 of the sporting regulations by running an illegal in-season test with a current car
The FIA's qualified approval did not and could not override article 22.4
Mercedes "did obtain some material advantage" which "at least potentially gave it an unfair sporting advantage"
The tribunal found in mitigation that:
There was no intention by either Pirelli or Mercedes to gain "any unfair sporting advantage"
Neither Pirelli not Mercedes acted in bad faith
Pirelli and Mercedes "disclosed to the FIA at least the essence of what they intended to do in relation to the test and attempted to obtain permission for it; and Mercedes had no reason to believe that approval had not been given"
The action of FIA race director Charlie Whiting, who had indicated the test would be permissible, were "taken in good faith and with the intention of assisting the parties and consistent with sporting fairness"
The tribunal said it was "unable to express any opinion" as to whether testing carried out by Ferrari with a two-year-old car in 2012 and 2013 was "properly authorised". But it said it was "equally unsatisfactory" that Whiting had given his consent to this even though the tribunal "had no evidence before it which indicates his opinion had in fact been wrong".
The decision to split the costs equally suggests the tribunal felt the FIA was not completely blameless in the episode.
The hearing on Thursday had established that Mercedes had asked permission for the test from the FIA, which had said it was theoretically possible as long as the other teams were given the same opportunity.
Neither Pirelli nor Mercedes informed the other teams of the test, apparently thinking that a previous general request to the teams asking for assistance in tyre testing was sufficient.
The test was conducted behind closed doors with Hamilton and Rosberg wearing black helmets rather than their normal colours.

Let off .

Lewis can drive at Silverstone .

It's all a load of crap.
Never were Mercedes going to be hammered . Never were Perilli going to be hammered .

It was a showcase to keep Red Bull and Ferrari happy. Nothing more.