They said a while ago they they admire Arsenal and want to model Liverpool on us, do you think these friendly relations can help sweeten the deal? We've always got on pretty well despite the wumming on ja606. £35m and a partnership where we loan you some promising youth players sounds like a fair deal for both parties.
posted on 15/7/13
Are is right if the amount is 40 plus i reckon we will sell to anyone but united. I doubt very much they want him though
posted on 15/7/13
Yeah maybe not Untited, but I wouldn't put it past em.
posted on 15/7/13
TBH surely it would be better to sell to United as we aren't rivals for 4th spot.
It is a bit taboo but I would rather sell you a good player than City or Chelsea.
posted on 15/7/13
Not that I am suggesting we do any business, wouldn't be right.
posted on 15/7/13
Why is the question will FSG sell, it will almost certainly be up to BR.
posted on 15/7/13
posted 53 minutes ago
Why is the question will FSG sell, it will almost certainly be up to BR.
--------
Because ARE said so, and of course all his whining doom mongering always comes true
posted on 15/7/13
Hmm lets deal with certainties here...
Suarez leaving Liverpool will certainly weaken Liverpool.
Suarez joining Arsenal will certainly strengthen Arsenal.
Thereby logic dictates that it is a bad move for Liverpool to sell him.
Thereby selling Suarez is illogical unless a logic defying bid comes in. £45m+
If Wenger had employed this type of thinking, he'd have been able to squeeze far more out of the Van Persie fee.
Sorry Gooners, you're going to miss out on Suarez as Wenger doesn't do "illogical" things.
posted on 16/7/13
Term.
Was there the same 'whining, doom-mongering' when they sold our best player to Chelsea 2 years ago?
posted on 16/7/13
Torres wasn't our best player when we sold him.
posted on 16/7/13
Fake.
That's your opinion. You're welcome to it.