Taking inspiration from the article about Pogba. When was the last time a decent player made it through the academy? I don't mean Welbeck or Cleverely as that's seriously up for debate about their quality. Fergie bashed on about how they have a good way of doing things like they go out on loan etc but half the time the loan team don't play them.
Is the club going about things the wrong way? Should some of them be dropped in the deep end to see if they sink or swim? And is there anything to indicate it'll be different with Moyes?
The route through youth
posted on 13/8/13
Good shout Ji. The only two to have properly proven themselves I'd argue would be Pique and Evans. The jury is out on the rest or they're not quite up there (imo)
posted on 13/8/13
Im not arguing about Rafael but using him as an exception to the rule as he wasn't sent out on loan.
posted on 13/8/13
Ji, regarding your point on right or wrong way I'd agree with that which is why I question the clubs insistence on doing it so rigidly (apart from the very odd exception)
posted on 13/8/13
Shawcross is 100% up there.... Don't be fooled by the unfashionable club he plays for, he is a top, top defender and was their captain at a young age. I really think that if the pro Arsenal media hadn't gone to town on him, he'd have made quite a name for himself, by now.
SAF openly said that he tried to resign him and considered him one that got away.
posted on 13/8/13
Fair point on Shawcross. Can add him to the ist per say.
posted on 13/8/13
Ji, regarding your point on right or wrong way I'd agree with that which is why I question the clubs insistence on doing it so rigidly (apart from the very odd exception)
----------------------------------------------
I think the club look for certain values in players, above and beyond raw skill. The loan moves and the idea of patience and moving up are part of what is instilled into the players deemed suitable for UTD.
I always thought that SAF seemed to be testing their personalities, as well as their skills.
I guess having a fairly rigid path to follow gives the players hope while they are lingering around in the reserves, seeing big names in their position, in the 1st team.
posted on 13/8/13
I just think it's too rigid. Especially when the loan clubs can be very unreliable and stunt their growth.
posted on 13/8/13
How can anybody call Welbeck average? Seriously!!!
He always turns up on the big occasion, Euro's, vs Madrid, that volley vs City.
His finishing aside be is one of the best forward line players in the league. His link up play and his vision is as good as any and he is playing out of position.
posted on 13/8/13
Fletcher, boy I miss him!
posted on 13/8/13
The deep end is always the best for me. Loans should for 6 months tops, then bring them back and throw them in. Perennial loans miss one key thing which is learning a teams system. They get coached in another system, need to master it only to come back when they should be taking advantage of their so called experience. All this assumes the manager uses them inthe right place or even at all.
The deep end shows if you can make it at YOUR club. It shows you what you should aim for. Some players go away and think they are good enough already and it can increase their impatience.
For me, the purpose of youth setups is to create players capable of playing for the club. Going on loan has very little effect in determining just how capable. In fact for me, the more loans you go on, the less likely you are going to play for your parent club