Rooney, Walcott, Defoe, Lambert, Carroll, Sturridge, Holt, Agbonlahor, Bent, Zamora, Heskey, Crouch, Young, Dyer, Sinclair, Ince, Routledge, Adam Johnson, Lennon, Wright-Phillips, Cole, Downing, Andrew Johnson, Hooper, Graham, Nugent, Rodriguez, Phillips, Le Fondre, Jerome, Raheem Stirling, Andros Townsend, Jordan Rhodes, Pope, Almunia, Akpom, Moses Jeffers Deeney, Akinfenwa, Kane and Beckford
Any I've missed?
England forwards better than Welbeck
posted on 14/8/13
'Lambert' - I mean, you don't get more Scottish than that.
__________________________________
Not unless there's a player called Carlsberg Special Brew.
posted on 14/8/13
Zaha wasn't that great when he came on either. I don't rate his crossing ability.
posted on 14/8/13
You forgot Matt Jarvis
posted on 14/8/13
Zaha is worse than Welbeck.
posted on 14/8/13
I haven't seen enough of Zaha really, but I can't imagine he could be worse.
posted on 15/8/13
I'll make a serious post on this wum post.
The following are better strikers: Rooney, Walcott and Sturridge.
The following are better finishers: Lambert, Defoe, Bent and Crouch.
Welbeck is a better player than those finishers and better allround player than Walcott. If he adds finishing, then he will be behind Rooney and Sturridge.
Endland's best strikers are Rooney, Sturridge, Lambert and then Walcott.
posted on 15/8/13
I wouldn't even say he's a better all round player than Walcott TBH.
posted on 15/8/13
"Better all round player" is such an easy get out.
What does he do that makes him such a good all round player?
posted on 15/8/13
If Heskey could added finishing he would've been world class. If I can add technique, skills, pace, dribbling, and finishing I would be Messi.
posted on 3/9/14
Welbeck is now better than all of these players.