To watch,
For me in this order:
Chelsea
Spurs
Man U
I think watching Chelsea, us like watching paint dry! one dimensional even functional, paying not to get beat.
Spurs ok May be a big harsh having replaced most of their team, but yet on honest assessment, seem to get a goal and shut up shop, may well get 4 th but no one will care.
UTD seem to be playing with a lot of pressure and fear, I know they beat bottom of the league yesterday, but you would have thought they had won the F.A cup, a true indication that years of domination are over, and may well be joining everton as a mid table team.
Your thoughts?
Teams you wouldn't pay........
posted on 6/10/13
harsh on chelsea and spurs, considering we have teams such as fulham, aston villa, and us in the second half.
posted on 6/10/13
I find us massively more enjoyable to watch this season than last year where we usually waited for a Bale thunderbolt.
Do miss the style of the team we had in Redknapps final year though sometimes.
posted on 6/10/13
Stoke, West Ham and Liverpool
posted on 6/10/13
Stoke, West Ham and Liverpool
correction,
Stoke, west ham, Man utd, liverpool's second halves
posted on 6/10/13
^ ..
posted on 6/10/13
West Ham are definitely the worst team to watch.
Stoke have played some nice stuff at times this year
posted on 6/10/13
I don't think Liverpool have been particularly exciting in the first half of games either they have been winning but not exciting.
posted on 6/10/13
Liverpool are terribly boring to watch sometimes. So this attempted wum is somewhat self-defeating.
posted on 6/10/13
liverpool's second halves
----------------------------
Liverpool don't seem to be particularly good in second half of games. How many goals have the scored after half time? Is Rodgers slipping the players some of his son's rohypnol?
posted on 6/10/13
Spurs and Arsenal are very entertaining sides that play good football. Chelsea are exciting when they're not holding back. United have been boring since the Ronaldo/Rooney/Tevez partnership was dismantled