if the transfers of fab and nasri go through you boys SHOULD have 60 odd mill to spend, if i was wenger i would raid europe straight away 3 players from any of the below
gourcuff
toullalon sp?
bastos
briand
zarate
hamsik
lavezzi
cavani
there is no reason any of these players should not be on the radar for a team like arsenal, all hugely skilled players if i was wenger i would sign gourcuff michel bastos ans hamsik, but all of these players would be wonderful assets to your club.
im not a wum, if i wasnt a rover id be a gooner always have admired arsenal
60 million to spend
posted on 12/8/11
Edin Hazard
posted on 12/8/11
Not Gourcuff.
Toulalan has moved.
Bastos is a possibly too attack-minded - I think we need more defensive solidity.
Briand is no real improvement, and risky.
Zarate would be too expensive and can't play through the middle on his own.
Hamsik is someone I love, but it'll take something massive to get him and Napoli to part.
Lavezzi is overrated imo.
Cavani has had one excellent season, and I'm not sure we would pay the asking price on the back of that.
posted on 12/8/11
This is a terrible article. None of these players are realistic targets, none of them are defenders, many of them are not good enough, some would be too expensive, Toulalan has already moved to Malaga, and none are defenders.
posted on 12/8/11
Surely a creative midfielder and a defender should be top priority with that money?
Not another winger like Eden Hazard! What is it with you guys and wingers, you just can't get enough!
posted on 12/8/11
We will probably get Jadson for 12M and Dann for 6M. The balance 48M will be eaten by Kroenke and his fellow shareholders. And they will leave Wenger to be scapegoated by all and sundry for being cheap and frugal like he has always been.
posted on 12/8/11
comment by Arsenal fan
just so you know, no shareholders receive any dividends at all. but don't let facts get in the way of bullsheeet