or to join or start a new Discussion

36 Comments
Article Rating 3 Stars

getting worried now

Nothing on Chelsea web site to suggest why Mata is not at training.

Giving Mata to Utd means better league position for them this season. Better signings in the summer and Utd to win the title next season with Mata scoring a brace in BOTH games against us.

Really cannot understand why we would do this?

sure the money is all good but we can get that from anyone.

Rooney is in decline so any swap for him is laughable.

We better have Costa lined up or i will be livid!

Every season we make ourselves look like tw@s for one reason or another.

nothing would surprise me anymore, get rid of Jose for Avram Grant again and buy Rio Ferdinand and Ashley Young for £50m. why not sell Hazard to City whilst we are at it. Courtois can go there too with Dave and Willian going to Arsenal for £10m a pop. we'll buy Rodwell from City for £40m too.

Selling Mata to utd is as rediculous as all of the above!

posted on 22/1/14

We may have to engage The Ace Face at some point to clarify what Picasso described as the 'Perpetual unreliability of the indecent Caaant' 1903.

posted on 22/1/14

Drink

I hear you

posted on 22/1/14

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 22/1/14

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 22/1/14

Insufferable-piffle, D ick and Rick hoyte, fecking heroes IMO, nuff said (U4388)

no it doesn't but City Choice or whatever has seen 1 picture and decides that it is racist.

i see it simply as a piece of art

posted on 22/1/14

It could be a racist piece of art.

posted on 22/1/14

The white version was sexist, the racism apperas when a person who is not white and has suffered years of repression (as a race)is made to appear as a seat for a very rich white lady


IMO that is how you interprate the PHOTO not the piece of atr itself.
is it only racist if a white lady is sitting on it? what if no one is sitting on it?

posted on 22/1/14

comment by Bluethruandthru - I'll tickle her bum (U11684)
posted 3 minutes ago
The white version was sexist, the racism apperas when a person who is not white and has suffered years of repression (as a race)is made to appear as a seat for a very rich white lady


IMO that is how you interprate the PHOTO not the piece of atr itself.
is it only racist if a white lady is sitting on it? what if no one is sitting on it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It doesn't exist?

comment by Guv (U12850)

posted on 22/1/14

The point is that some people see racism or sexism or whatever type of -ism in everything. Sometimes they may be right and such occurrences need to be sorted but all too often the there is nothing of the sort involved at all. Such people seem to think it is their job to show indignation on behalf of others who themselves see nothing wrong.

Baa, baa, black sheep is a good example. Became green sheep for a bit and is now typically rainbow sheep. My kids often asked me what a rainbow sheep was and why they had never seen one. I mean, it's not even as if the original lyrics were Baa baa black sheep is a c**t cos he's black. In fact he was a good and generous sheep who gave wool to lots of people.

That said, the timing by Roman's young lady was not the best.

posted on 22/1/14

Roman is Jewish, I don't know about his lady. Oppression and redemption is part of the human psyche.

What if it was Oprah sitting on Charlton Hestons face?

Oooh Mingey, the humanity.

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 3 from 1 vote

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available