The reality is he doesn't look more likely to score as much as giroud is but against Chelsea, the likes of terry and Cahill would not have played against him so it could provide them with an element of unpredictability with him.
Giroud will be kept on lock by Terry and Cahill, that is pretty much a guarantee so maybe try sanogo.
Yes it will be a gamble and unfortunately our striker situation is pretty dire but maybe it worth trying something different.
Is it worth starting Sanogo next week??
posted on 16/3/14
I'd play Sanogo. Each time he has played he has caused havoc. Probably Girouds most anonymous game of the season today.
posted on 16/3/14
I wouldn't say he has created havoc but maybe it's worth trying him against Chelsea who would not have played against him
posted on 16/3/14
Giroud was absent til which we actually needed him in the last 15, and he did tbf hold the ball up and win crucial fouls. He had NO-ONE near him for most the match.
posted on 16/3/14
Possession is very important to us.
yeah....we had just 41% today and won the game.
posted on 16/3/14
Heard you the first time Castor
posted on 16/3/14
yeah....we had just 41% today... and we won
------------
Are you serious? Even Wenger admitted we were p/ss poor and were lucky to get a result.
You give a quality team the sort of possession we did today and you will not get a result 95 times out of 100. Thankfully Spurs finishing belonged in those 5 games where you luck out.
I still can't believe that you defend Giroud with the most absurd excuses.
I know lets use the new tactic. Lets start with 10 men behind the ball and not play a striker at all. Thats sarcasm by the way!
posted on 16/3/14
No need to read the article or any replies, the simple answer is yes. Giroud offered us nothing and should have costed us the match. He couldnt even simply hold the ball up which should be bare minimum. There is absolutely no risk playing Sanogo against Chelsea, if we play Giroud he will 100% bottle it
posted on 16/3/14
comment by The Godfather (U10154)
posted 1 hour, 49 minutes ago
No need to read the article or any replies, the simple answer is yes. Giroud offered us nothing and should have costed us the match. He couldnt even simply hold the ball up which should be bare minimum. There is absolutely no risk playing Sanogo against Chelsea, if we play Giroud he will 100% bottle it
-------
If i wrote that i would've been called a WOB.
posted on 17/3/14
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 17/3/14
Injured?