Man United v Man City Official Match Thread

I didn't have Le Saux on the commentary...

A) The fact you think the keeper was within 10 yards of Rooney (as I stated I was talking about) makes me wonder if you were even watching the game Radio for you was it?

B) The 5 players he took out of position were in the general starting points, but the two behind him were chasing back, the one to his shoulder was, again, chasing back, and the two CBs were stepping up to challenge him. Therefore Rooney pulled 5 players out of their natural position, ergo, I was correct.

C) LOL!

--------------------------------------------------

As I posted many times sky box broke down so watched a link.

The only way there was 5 players ''around'' rooney was if you include the keeper

As for point B this happens all the time in football you plumb. Have you not had much experience watching football or playing? ball moves to the right everyone (including the attacking teams keeper) move to the right


LMFAO

The only way there was 5 players ''around'' rooney was if you include the keeper
------------------------------

So yeah, you didn't watch the game then? That or you can't count.

As for Point B...
--------

A player chasing back 20 yards, and two moving up 10 in 4-5 seconds isn't a team moving naturally, it's a team reacting to a threat.

When a ball is spread 50-60 feet to the other flank, the team will drift as a unit over. Rooney forced them to react, not drift. You plum (see how I spelt it correctly? That means I win, rules of the internet biat.ch).

A player chasing back 20 yards, and two moving up 10 in 4-5 seconds isn't a team moving naturally, it's a team reacting to a threat.

When a ball is spread 50-60 feet to the other flank, the team will drift as a unit over. Rooney forced them to react, not drift. You plum (see how I spelt it correctly? That means I win, rules of the internet biat.ch).

-------------------------------------------------------------------

LOl. If spelling makes you win then I aint even in the contest tbh. I type fast and cant be ar sed correcting

watch the replay kiddo its a myth like rooney being the best number 9

it simply didn't happen

Oh and sorry... Forgot the everpresent logic that you seem instant on espousing... LOL!

People are being overly dramatic, we played a good game, pushed man city back had a few chaances wellbeck flick, fellaini shot, mata shot rooney freekick and a few near crosses.

LOl. If spelling makes you win then I aint even in the contest tbh. I type fast and cant be ar sed correcting

watch the replay kiddo its a myth like rooney being the best number 9

it simply didn't happen
--------------------------------------

Evidently your sense of humour is as broken as your eyes. And I see you buy into the VC school of using "kiddo"/"kid" to try and win an argument.

You sir, with your name coupled with your inability to think logically, see clearly, and argue well, are quite an oxymoron. And a moronic one at that.

Oh and sorry... Forgot the everpresent logic that you seem instant on espousing... LOL!

-----------------------------------------------------------------

only thing logical is I just don't bother with smileys. easier to write LOL

but hey we know you make things up so knock yourself out

LOL WINK

Evidently your sense of humour is as broken as your eyes. And I see you buy into the VC school of using "kiddo"/"kid" to try and win an argument.

You sir, with your name coupled with your inability to think logically, see clearly, and argue well, are quite an oxymoron. And a moronic one at that.


-------------------------------------------------------

win? I thought this was a faceless internet forum?

come now I have humoured you enough have I not? and the kiddo thing is probably more indicative of my age (nearly as old as VC) than my love for the grumpy old so d

comment by RedReason (U5677)
posted less than a minute ago
Evidently your sense of humour is as broken as your eyes. And I see you buy into the VC school of using "kiddo"/"kid" to try and win an argument.

You sir, with your name coupled with your inability to think logically, see clearly, and argue well, are quite an oxymoron. And a moronic one at that.


-------------------------------------------------------

win? I thought this was a faceless internet forum?

come now I have humoured you enough have I not? and the kiddo thing is probably more indicative of my age (nearly as old as VC) than my love for the grumpy old so d


----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've not humoured me, we've disagreed (with me being correct, of course). Anyway, good argument over what amounted to one chance and about 10 seconds worth of play We'll have to agree to disagree.

You've not humoured me, we've disagreed (with me being correct, of course). Anyway, good argument over what amounted to one chance and about 10 seconds worth of play We'll have to agree to disagree.

----------------------------------------------------

well it made me smile anyway

yeah gonna have to go so agree to disagree

just watch the highlights <just4you>