Georgios Samaras:
SPL: 1459 minutes / 3 Goals = 486 minutes per goal
Cups: 312 + 285 + 162 + 180 = 939 / 4 Goals = 234.75 minutes per goal
Overall:1459 + 939 = 2398 / 7 Goals = 342.6 minutes per goal
Anthony Stokes:
SPL: 1976 minutes / 14 Goals = 141.1 minutes per goal
Cups: 166 + 259 + 112 = 537 / 5 Goals = 107.4 minutes per goal
Overall: 1976 + 537 = 2513 / 19 Goals = 132.3 minutes per goal
Gary Hooper:
SPL: 2106 minutes / 20 Goals = 105.3 minutes per goal
Cups: 439 + 390 + 90 = 919 / 2 Goals = 459.5 minutes per goal
Overall: 2106 + 919 = 3025 / 22 Goals = 137.5 minutes per goal
Kyle Lafferty:
SPL : 2102 minutes / 11 Goals = 191 minutes per goal
Cups: 104 + 244 + 255 + 21 = 624 / 4 Goals = 156 minutes per goal
Overall: 2102 + 624 = 2726 / 15 Goals = 181.75 minutes per goal
Kenny Miller:
SPL: 1520 minutes / 21 Goals = 72.4 minutes per goal
Cups: 501 minutes / 1 goal = 501 minutes per goal
Overall: 501 + 1520 = 2021 / 22 Goals = 91.9 minutes per goal
Nikica Jelavic
SPL: 1799 minutes / 16 goals = 112 .4 minutes per goal
Cups: 272 + 76 = 348 / 3 Goals = 116 minutes per goal
Overall: 1799 + 348 = 2147 / 19 Goals = 113 minutes per goal
Kenny Miller 91.9min per goal
Nikica Jelavic 113min per goal
Anthony Stokes 132.3min per goal
Gary Hooper 137.5min per goal
Kyle Lafferty 181.75min per goal
Haha Samaras 342.6min per goal
Gary Hooper the 4th best Old Firm Striker last season, not what the Tims would have you believe about Super Hooper
Old Firm Strikers Last Season
posted on 6/6/11
What lies?
The info is there for all to see, i don't miss out information to suit my needs like you do.
3 in a row has really got to you, then this your hurting big time.
Even CelticDave creating your article, i must have really gotten to you.
Bite Bite
Hook, Line and Sinker.
posted on 6/6/11
Statistics mean sweet f@@ck all like I proved...
Is Lenny a better european manager because he has won 50% of his games in charge,compared to a pathetic 1 win in 21 for Wattie?
posted on 6/6/11
Again CapBhoy you sure do like to miss out information when it doesn't suit you.
European ties are about progressing. We progressed, the less said about Celtic the better.
posted on 6/6/11
A classic case of twisting the statistics to suit your agenda
posted on 6/6/11
Which statistics am i twisting? <clutchingatstrawssmiley>
posted on 6/6/11
The one where you say 'oh Watties record doesn't matter coz he progressed' therefore you took ALL FACTORS into consideration and not just the figures
Try doing that for your pathetic attempt to discredit our Gary and you might go a long way to becoming worth debating.
posted on 6/6/11
Stokes £1.5million
Hooper £2.4million
Samaras £1million
£4.9million
Lafferty- £4million
Jelavic- £4million
Miller- £2million
£10million
Therefore, I think Celtic done well for what they paid. In addition Hooper and Stokes contribute a lot more than goals as the assist chart speaks for itself.
posted on 6/6/11
Yes i took in all factors and Jelavic was better, as is Smith better than Lennon.
Celtic Bhoy67 im not disputing Hooper being a good player im just using the stats to point out his record isn't as good under the microscope when compared to other players.
I would be very suprised if fans outside the old firm that watch the SPL rated Hooper better than Jelavic, i just think a neutral would pick Jelavic.
posted on 6/6/11
StevenDavisNo1
You are a biased moron
posted on 7/6/11
Still Hurting, you have been reduced to petty name calling.
Nikica Jelavic No1